What if getting everyone back to work too soon results in wave 2 and another lock down. Then the stock market drops way below where it did this time. I don’t think a vaccine or cure is possible by November. Maybe with further testing we hit a home run on an anti-viral to lessen the severity and time of the virus. That’s probably best case.
There will likely be some sort of “rebound” of the virus, but it won’t be as severe.
They will have a Reedy Creek Ambulance there on standby before that happens.Don’t know how the minnie van drivers will feel about being on the front line of dealing with possible covid-positive guests, especially in the cramped quarters of a car.
There is no way the current administration will let it drag out this long...they’ll isolate parts of the country before that happens.
The "non essential" businesses should be allowed to open now if they can operate under the same social distancing and mask regulations as the "essential" business. There's no more risk shopping at Michael's than there is at Publix if you apply the same social distancing. That should be step one in reopening and it should happen very soon.
I hope that’s the case too. It’s still just a hope though.
www.bbc.co.uk
This.
To provide a Minnie van to shuttle the guests to a testing center is not realistic. If 10K guests show up at MK which is a very slow day and perhaps 100 guests temperature is above the limit, it is not realistic to think Disney has at least 100 Minnie vans just waiting around idle. Universal Singapore takes the guests temperature before they temporarily closed. If a guest temperature exceeded limits, the guest was denied entry.
It's not like we the people will be able to vote on this issue. We need to come up with a scenario that is not one extreme or the other.
I mean...why wouldn't they? I'm not being snarky...but I'd rather have job security than extra pay for 4 months...but maybe that's just me? For instance, my husband was job searching and has applied to dozens of places because he shared that sentiment but we calculated it out...obviously for the short term he makes more by using unemployment... so why not? He tried to do the right thing but why would he go expose himself and possibly get me or our babies sick....and make beans...when he can wait out these few months and go back to the job he's held for 15 years?
I would think extra pay through unemployment/stimulus weekly pay, stay home for 4 months - risk of covid19 exposure - low
Yeah that is what I was saying. Someone above said 'if the cooks etc are getting paid more in UI then why wouldn't they stay home when Disney calls them back?'....I was saying I think they would go back when they're called for job security. My husband was going to try to get a job but right now UI is paying him more than finding a temp job... but when Disney calls him back he's going because he loves his job. I'm saying UI is temporary so I don't see many people choosing a very limited (4 month) span over job security....like they aren't going to decide not to go back to work if they're called in 3 months...just so they can collect UI for an extra month.
Major props to your husband, sounds like you got a real hustler there. Good on him.
