Wendy Pleakley
Well-Known Member
They didn't HAVE to reintroduce restrictions. The CDC guidance for the unvaccinated to wear masks is for the purpose of protecting other unvaccinated people. Since everybody has the opportunity to be vaccinated to protect themselves if they choose, no government should be mandating anything to protect people who choose, for whatever reason, not to protect themselves.
I think Australia proves that it is impossible to get rid of COVID through mitigation, testing and contact tracing. The only thing those measures do is "flatten the curve" and slow the pandemic. The only thing that will ever get rid of COVID is herd immunity gained through vaccination, natural infection or a combination of the two.
You can change my comment from 'had' to re-introduce restrictions to 'chose' to do so, but the result is the same.
Government imposes lots of rules for people's protection. Seatbelts and drug use are things that primarily impact the individual using or not using them, and there are still laws around those behaviours.
Sometimes the government will try and protect those that don't help themselves. That's the reality. It's frustrating for everyone who is vaccinated because it feels like they're being punished for the actions of others, but government in this case is just trying to keep the entire population safer, and isn't going to worry about what's fair nor throw unvaccinated people under the bus. It's easy for the rest of us to say "leave those idiots to their fate" but the government has a higher standard of care to adhere to.
Last edited: