danlb_2000
Premium Member
No, they can't.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion
- Thread starter Parker in NYC
- Start date
-
- Tags
- coronavirus covid covid-19
- Status
No, they can't.
MorphinePrince
Well-Known Member
Here for it! Anything that keeps the ball rolling!! I'll wear a hat, t-shirt, a gold chain, anything that proves I've got the vaccine so long as we don't have to reinstate any restrictions.
DisneyFan32
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
This virus resurgence will getting worse in months as fall/winter comes then we'll screwed if we will better until next year.
Heppenheimer
Well-Known Member
Or further adding to the labor and supply chain crunches is another negative consequence that affects everyone.
Slpy3270
Well-Known Member
Actually with Delta we'll need to reach 98% fully vaccinated, and I don't think any country will ever reach that threshold.
Covid-19 'is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated,' CDC director says | CNN
With Covid-19 cases rising in all 50 states, health officials say it's clear that unvaccinated people are both driving the increase in cases and are most at risk.www.cnn.com
If this fall and winter season comes, we're screwed if we don't reach 70-80% people fully vaccinated
Plus, a major problem with the idea that this is the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" is that the CDC is not tracking breakthrough infections unless it leads to hospitalizations and deaths, which makes absolutely no sense since there's evidence that fully vaxxed people may still be spreading it to the unvaxxed. It also puts LA County's clain of 99.6% of cases unvaxxed in major scrutiny.
DonniePeverley
Well-Known Member
Question for you ... once you catch covid, can you catch it again? I ask because i often hear the term 'herd immunity'
Sorry if discussed before.
And I have. The expectation of “no restrictions” is precisely why I’m not going any time soon. It’s a win for me and a win for anyone who will be taking my spot in line.
DisneyCane
Well-Known Member
If 98% is needed that's 98% immune not vaccinated. With the ease that delta seems to spread among the unvaccinated, it won't take that long for the unvaccinated to have natural immunity.
Even a dictatorship wouldn't get 98% vaccinated.
Last edited:
Yes, someone who previously had covid can catch it again.
DisneyCane
Well-Known Member
It's seems to be similar to the vaccines where there is an effectiveness component and and also a (as yet unknown) duration component to natural immunity.
Slpy3270
Well-Known Member
That would literally mean tens of millions of American deaths, and since seniors have already been mostly fully vaxxed the main spreaders and casualties would have to be children, young people and those in poverty, all three of which have many barriers to getting vaxxed despite being the most eager of the groups to get them.
danlb_2000
Premium Member
There was some buzz in the media last year about re-infection, but it hasn't turned out to be a big problem, so it looks like previous infection has pretty high efficacy against re-infection. Efficacy from natural infection will also vary when you are exposed to a different variant then you were originally infected with.
danlb_2000
Premium Member
That number is way to high. Currently there are 35 million reported cases in the US and 624,000 deaths. So if we scale 35 million to the US population of 328 million, that is 9.4, so 624,000 * 9.4 = 5.8 million deaths, but that would be an unrealistic worst case. Reported cases is probably a significant under count which would lower the death number. Also, a significant portion of the vulnerable population has been vaccinated so we are not going to see the same death rate now as we saw earlier in the pandemic. Finally there are a lot of vaccinated people who are even less likely to die.
Letting everyone get infected will result in more deaths, but unless a far more lethal variant pops up it wouldn't be "tens of millions".
Smooth
Well-Known Member
Study: COVID-19 Reinfection Rate Less Than 1% for Those Who Had Severe Illness
The findings showed that 63 of the 9119 patients with severe COVID-19 infection contracted the virus a second time, with an average reinfection period of 116 days.
LaughingGravy
Well-Known Member
Ring around the Rosie. I see what you did there, LOLThis thread is a merry go round LOL. Just keeps going around and around the same discussions.Ring around the rosie...
Kman
Well-Known Member
Don't forget excess mortality which basically doubles the total number of deaths.
SamusAranX
Well-Known Member
The Constitution states the federal gov’t (Congress) is empowered to provide for the general welfare. Under the delegation doctrines, Congress has delegated much authority to regulatory agencies such as the CDC. We also have almost 100 years of SCOTUS precedent stating that Congress can regulate commerce, including that anything that substantially affects it, even if it remains within one state. Even Scalia, a hardcore conservative, ruled in favor of this principle in Gonzales v Reich.
Covid has more then substantially affected commerce, and not just intrastate but interstate. I.e. a regulation or law can be passed or issued that can mandate large businesses to implement masks, for example. Even if the business is doing business only, in say, Palatka, Florida; past decisions have held that indirect or aggregate effects of said business can be said to affect interstate commerce, and thus be regulated. It is the basis, for example, of civil rights laws. See Heart of Atlanta Motel v United States or Wickard v Filburn. The former allowed civil rights legislation to be applied to a hotel that did business only in Georgia (I.e. it literally wasn’t interstate commerce). The latter stated that a regulatory agency could establish a quota order that prevented an individual in one state from growing wheat on his own land!
Last edited:
SamusAranX
Well-Known Member
See my response to @Chi84 ; there is definitely a case to be made. I think it’s more a policy and political choice that is being made. It would be political suicide. But is it constitutional [a federal stay at home/lockdown order]? Yeah, I think so
DC0703
Well-Known Member
Unless a variant arises that obliterates all vaccine immunity, I don't see any reason why we would have lockdowns again. Mask mandates maybe, but not lockdowns. With working vaccines, a majority of deaths at this point are preventable. You are right that it would be political suicide - causing hefty economic pain in a time when many businesses are still struggling, solely to protect unvaccinated people who refuse to help themselves and who will continue to congregate unmasked anyway... there is little upside to that politically.
Phil12
Well-Known Member
Where I live in Florida less than 35% of the county residents have been vaccinated. New cases of COVID-19 are increasing along with more hospitalizations for COVID-19. And deaths from COVID-19 are increasing as well.
People that I know who have not been vaccinated think that the vaccine is either pointless, harmful or a direct infringement on their constitutional rights. They completely distrust the government and they refuse to comply with wearing a mask or social distancing.
And, unfortunately, in most of Florida these people are in the majority:
People that I know who have not been vaccinated think that the vaccine is either pointless, harmful or a direct infringement on their constitutional rights. They completely distrust the government and they refuse to comply with wearing a mask or social distancing.
And, unfortunately, in most of Florida these people are in the majority:
- Status