Incomudro
Well-Known Member
I agree with your post very much.Reading through the discussion as to whether it was wise to close down “with a sledgehammer” at the beginning of the pandemic I feel there is no correct answer! We will never know how many extra deaths or serious illnesses were prevented but equally we will never know if keeping outside activities open would have been beneficial or not had any significant impact on the number of deaths. The thing perhaps we should remember is that no one knew at that time and to a lesser extent now, which mitigation methods were/are most effective. I can only imagine the problems and angst of Governors (?) and advisors who had to make these life changing / life saving/ life costing decisions knowing that whichever way they go people will complain. Perhaps the fact that we are still discussing the rights/wrongs of their decisions a year down the line and are still divided means they got it just about right! However 559,000 deaths in the USA and still climbing probably proves they didn’t.
I can only imagine the damned if they did and damned if they didn't decisions that governors had to make.
One thing I will say however, is that the US did poorly with covid because our population is so unhealthy to begin with.
You’re not suggesting we protect the most vulnerable, are you?![]()
They could protect themselves as well.
I was often shocked at the age and condition of some people out and about when covid was raging.
Everything you need can be ordered.