GoofGoof
Premium Member
The people have a say here too. The government doesn’t have to require a full stay at home order for people to revert to more limitations on their own. There was an article posted here many pages back from one of the FL newspapers where they analyzed cell phone data to track mobility and determined that back in March several weeks before any government imposed shut down orders in FL people began to severely limit their time out of the home and changed their behavior. If there’s a prolonged and dramatic increase in infection it’s possible some (even a lot of) people will just go back to more restricted activity on their own. Things like going back to take out only from restaurants, avoiding crowded shopping areas like malls, avoiding large group gatherings (movie theaters, NASCAR races, theme parks, concerts), go back to praying at home, etc... Although you won’t stop everyone without a government mandate it could have a large impact on slowing spread and may help appease some of the political angst if it’s not mandated.I too think there will be so much pressure to prevent it from happening. From so many levels. Even half a step backwards (reverting to an earlier phase) they won't do.
However, I think the vast majority of people, wherever they land on this spectrum, at least acknowledge New York had to be closed down. The issue becomes how long will they dig their feet in *if* a state starts to look like New York or Italy. I hope none do, but on the balance of things one likely will with the second wave.
Even more worryingly, what if it does and they still won't reverse course?
All that being said, I’m still hopeful that the recent numbers are an outlier and the longer term trend will still show an overall decline and this will all be an academic debate.