News Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

DarkMetroid567

Well-Known Member
Folks it’s entirely possible to do way with the current configuration of TSI and maintain some semblance of the current Liberty Square and riverfront area and build out what they plan to do - especially if they connect it around behind to Fantasyland.

But they clearly wanted Liberty Square as it presently exists gone.
I’ve said this before but god I Really want nothing more than LS gone

EDIT: unless they bring back muppets. Then we’re back
 

Obi-Ron-Kenobi

New Member
But this isn’t about Tom Sawyer and the river not being “trendy” it’s about no longer having water and peaceful views in the middle of a busy theme park.

To be clear, I would much prefer if they saved the river and the views to this plan. I'm referring more to the posts that this is a huge strategic mistake that will cost visitors, the posts about how this is another sign of the "demise" of Disney, and especially the ones that want to make it political.

You can dislike the decision without also taking it as a direct attack on you as a person, lol
 

The Empress Lilly

Well-Known Member
But this isn’t about Tom Sawyer and the river not being “trendy” it’s about no longer having water and peaceful views in the middle of a busy theme park.
They are spending billions to solve the ugliness of WDSP by building a large tranquil water so it looks more like a classic Disney park, while removing it in the MK so it will more resemble WDSP/Disney Adventure Park.
 

bwr827

Well-Known Member
I thought Disney had learned to appreciate the importance of water; they're totally reconfiguring Adventure World f/k/a Disney Studios Paris around a new lake. Now, they're replacing Magic Kingdom's main water feature with a cars land? I don't get it.
Calling it “a cars land” is a misrepresentation. This is no Radiator Springs. It looks like a wild, frontier-worthy environment.
 

phillip9698

Well-Known Member
So? I keep on seeing these kinds of comments, but htey make no sense.

The choice wasn't "put in Cars" vs "keep RoA/TSI". The choice is "Remove RoA/TSI to put in Cars" vs "Put in Cars and keep RoA/TSI". We can debate the finer points of Cars in MK, but they didn't have to put it in that particular location.

Why not retain the RoA and keep that ambiance and have all the benefit of the Cars addition? Who exactly is losing in that situation?

The easiest to see answer is if they build Cars elsewhere and keep RoA/TSI then they use valuable land for Cars and still have a large area that hardly anyone ever visits………..which would eventually be replaced.

Disney doesn’t want areas people don’t frequent taking up that much space.
 

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
I'll have something on that soon
1723500317427.png
 

larryz

I'm Just A Tourist!
Premium Member
The audacity displayed in this thread is astounding! All these "experts" proudly proclaiming "Disney can't do this..." or "Disney can't do that..."!!!

Tell you what -- you want a say in what they can or can't do, buy a controlling amount of DIS stock and show up at the Annual Meeting.

Otherwise, get a grip and realize that you're just a revenue unit who will pay WHAT DISNEY ASKS for WHAT DISNEY OFFERS. If you don't like it, take your money somewhere else and clear the walkway space for their new customers.

I think I'm starting to get Iger's disdain for WDW now...
 

AdventureHasAName

Well-Known Member
The audacity displayed in this thread is astounding! All these "experts" proudly proclaiming "Disney can't do this..." or "Disney can't do that..."!!!

Tell you what -- you want a say in what they can or can't do, buy a controlling amount of DIS stock and show up at the Annual Meeting.

Otherwise, get a grip and realize that you're just a revenue unit who will pay WHAT DISNEY ASKS for WHAT DISNEY OFFERS. If you don't like it, take your money somewhere else and clear the walkway space for their new customers.

I think I'm starting to get Iger's disdain for WDW now...
They can do it. We're just saying it's stupid and shortsighted ... which it is.
 

Dizknee_Phreek

Well-Known Member
I’m sorry if I triggered you with my opinion on the matter which is generally unbothered.

I’m tired of the hypocrisy in the Disney (adult) community when it comes to new additions. It’s like the opposite of the Tiana/Splash announcement- if you weren’t on board with Tiana then you were labeled as “weird” or unable to let go of the past. Then the ride opens and look what happened and how people switched up.

I guess now removing a body of water and a generally unused area for new attractions is suddenly the end of the Disney parks according to certain people on here? I’m annoyed with people embracing the negatives over postive aspects of what this land could bring- I don’t think that’s weird of me at all.
Never said I was triggered by your opinion. But you sure seem to be triggered over others' opinions.

I was one opposed to the Splash/Tiana switch. Mostly because I didn't like PatF as a movie. And because Splash was a modern masterpiece of an attraction and I didn't trust current Disney to make a replacement worthy of that. My opinion hasn't changed since TBA has opened. And I have the same opinion now about this news. RoA is picturesque and one of the few relaxing areas in all of MK. I don't trust current Disney to do the area justice. BBTM was supposed to use new area. This whole time Disney has never said anything about completely removing RoA, so this is a shock to a lot of people. I think it's natural for people to be upset when they feel blindsided.
 

Horizonsfan

Well-Known Member
Looks like the Railroad track will be right outside of the one laydown yard. I do have to wonder if they will eventually close the railroad and put in a construction access road to tie this yard to the construction area.

You could do a temp road and still maintain operations similar to a parade crossing. I could see delayed openings & longer waits at the stations, but full closure for an extended period doesn't seem immediately necessary.

One would think they'd want the capacity, especially if that BTMRR redo ever surfaces.
 

davis_unoxx

Well-Known Member
Alligators are a danger in any waterway bigger than a drinking fountain. You’re next, World Showcase Lagoon!
Ugh, I was at the Seas Pavilion yesterday and was thinking to myself, this is the stuff I love the old Disney. Walked to bakery in France Pavilion after too. This makes me really sad, people don’t come back to Disney just for the rides but the atmosphere.
 

scottb411

Well-Known Member
This definitely expands capacity at the Magic Kingdom with the number of guests enjoying the cars and villain's attractions vs TSI and the Riverboat so that is a good thing. Also, I think this will help with parade viewing and the guests trying to get around those watching the parade from a logistics standpoint. That has always seemed to be an issue in Frontierland so I like the added capacity for that part of the park for pedestrians to be free from interrupting parade watchers.

There are a lot more places around Disney World to enjoy water views than when the park first opened like the Boardwalk area and the river around Animal Kingdom. If you want to go on a Riverboat, you can visit the city of New Orleans or Downtown Sanford in Orlando:


If I were Disney, I would move the boat over to Fort Wilderness and/or the Wilderness Lodge in some capacity and do some sunset and fireworks cruises on the boat in Bay Lake if they were able to configure so that it can be safely steered.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom