I’m not even talking about Bugs Land, you goof. lol You were talking about DL and how it had to change with the times. Good thing they replaced that old castle and mountain with something more hip and edgy.It's not an argument, it's a fact. You don't like the type of changes, I get it, I don't like them all either. But if they work, then they are doing something right. DCA seems to be busier than ever these days.
And sorry but if you seriously think replacing a cheap kiddie land that had literally carnival rides in it is somehow a better fit than a land with with rides people above the age of 10 can ride and modern attactions this kind of says it all.
ABL was also an IP shoehorned into the park in desperate attempt to cash in on the name. Which is also why these arguments are just weird. You're basically complaining Disney is getting rid of of their IPs for another one although ABL didn't fit the theme anymore than people claim Marvel does. And one people actually care about Marvel. As much as people claimed they loved ITTBAB I bet it was hardly ever more than half full. Last time I went it was 20 people in the theater. Is that 'standing the test of time' to you? What exactly is the argument then? Its the exact same thing. Its surprising ABL lasted as long as it did.
I could understand TOT and agree with people who hated to see it go for GOTG. That, we're in complete agreement with your premise. But with ABL, its not even a debate for me.