Rumor Brazil (and maybe others) Pavilion Coming to Epcot [not about Brazilian people nor a country wish list]

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
It actually carried on for a while with no sponsor. Then uncle Bob decided he wouldn’t pay.
I can understand why they would struggle to find companies to sponsor the whole pavilion. The old EPCOT sponsorship model seems dead. It does surprise me, though, that they can't find outside vendors to sign lucrative leases for a Brazilian churrascaria or perhaps a Havianas store that would help pay for the construction and upkeep of the pavilion. Some kind of branding/sales deal for Brahma beer would also seem like something Anheuser-Busch would consider. Who knows, maybe not.

Without a ride, the pavilions are not that different from miniature malls, if we're honest. Shouldn't be that hard to get it to make sense financially.
 

Josh Hendy

Well-Known Member
Tourism is bigger than ever. International business investment is bigger than ever. I don't believe that sponsorship doesn't work in a park like Epcot. It's viable in both in Futureworld and in International Showcase.

I believe the "sponsorship doesn't work" meme is propagated by bean counters focused on easy, short term profits based IP based merch, not by visionaries who take a long term view of guest experience.

Many people love Epcot more than any other park, specifically because of the scientific-cultural theme. Turn it into a pale imitation of MK or DHS and these people are not going to be as attracted to WDW.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
Fictional lands can be entirely in-house projects including financing. Just saying. Seems like a bad idea to purists until the ribbon cutting.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It actually carried on for a while with no sponsor. Then uncle Bob decided he wouldn’t pay.
That’s always what it comes down too. I think you know this has been a revolving door since 1983.
I’m not saying anything you don’t know
I can understand why they would struggle to find companies to sponsor the whole pavilion. The old EPCOT sponsorship model seems dead. It does surprise me, though, that they can't find outside vendors to sign lucrative leases for a Brazilian churrascaria or perhaps a Havianas store that would help pay for the construction and upkeep of the pavilion. Some kind of branding/sales deal for Brahma beer would also seem like something Anheuser-Busch would consider. Who knows, maybe not.

Without a ride, the pavilions are not that different from miniature malls, if we're honest. Shouldn't be that hard to get it to make sense financially.
It Just never works out.
Tourism is bigger than ever. International business investment is bigger than ever. I don't believe that sponsorship doesn't work in a park like Epcot. It's viable in both in Futureworld and in International Showcase.

I believe the "sponsorship doesn't work" meme is propagated by bean counters focused on easy, short term profits based IP based merch, not by visionaries who take a long term view of guest experience.

Many people love Epcot more than any other park, specifically because of the scientific-cultural theme. Turn it into a pale imitation of MK or DHS and these people are not going to be as attracted to WDW.
Disney has always wanted severe terms in longterm financial support...which always ends up being the deal killer.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
What in the Sam hell are you talking about here?

Self financing? That won’t happen

As opposed to sponsors or foreign entities. Like TSL or GE.

It is time for people to move beyond the notion WS is a place of great cultural influence and enlightenment.

Unleash Imagineering for some 'sketch on a napkin' ideas to a full-fledged new land. WS expansion pads are the perfect blank canvas.

Strictly my opinion of course.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
As opposed to sponsors or foreign entities. Like TSL or GE.

It is time for people to move beyond the notion WS is a place of great cultural influence and enlightenment.

Unleash Imagineering for some 'sketch on a napkin' ideas to a full-fledged new land. WS expansion pads are the perfect blank canvas.

Strictly my opinion of course.
Imagineering designed the Brazil Pavilion.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
Imagineering designed the Brazil Pavilion.

Fantastic. But it is still within parameters as requested by outside interests. I'm all for new pavilions but they never seen to make it past the concept/design phase.

Fictional lands (IE Atlantis for those not tracking) could be entirely in-house. I'm thinking something like Pandora on a smaller scale and strictly WDI designed.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
As opposed to sponsors or foreign entities. Like TSL or GE.

It is time for people to move beyond the notion WS is a place of great cultural influence and enlightenment.

Unleash Imagineering for some 'sketch on a napkin' ideas to a full-fledged new land. WS expansion pads are the perfect blank canvas.

Strictly my opinion of course.
But that’s why this doesn’t happen...the overhead is so high on Epcot that they will never abandon the model and accept all the costs to run new pavilions...and doing “world of Mickey” next to Germany would just be stupid.

It’s a prison of their own making
Imagineering designed the Brazil Pavilion.
As they did the Spain, Australia, Russia, Israel and Greek pavilions...😉
 

Josh Hendy

Well-Known Member
It is time for people to move beyond the notion WS is a place of great cultural influence and enlightenment.

It isn't tremendously enlightening. But it's "enlightening enough" to attract many people to WDW who consider fairy tale and superhero based attractions to be too frivolous to justify a vacation in Orlando.

My sister-in-law for example who teaches French in high school. She loves reading and international travel visiting cathedrals, castles, museums and stuff. Epcot with its faux France and fake Germany was the only WDW park she really enjoyed. There are a lot of people like that, who are embarrassed to tell their friends they went on a vacation mostly to see Mickey Mouse and Star Wars characters. But sipping wine and watching mimes and whatever is just their thing.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
But that’s why this doesn’t happen...the overhead is so high on Epcot that they will never abandon the model and accept all the costs to run new pavilions...and doing “world of Mickey” next to Germany would just be stupid.

It’s a prison of their own making

As they did the Spain, Australia, Russia, Israel and Greek pavilions...😉

They have already added Frozen and Rat so anything is possible at this point. Like I said, traditional pavilions are great but never seem to happen. So a new direction seems like a reasonable solution.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
They have already added Frozen and Rat so anything is possible at this point. Like I said, traditional pavilions are great but never seem to happen. So a new direction seems like a reasonable solution.
Yeah...that’s not the way to go...but I think you know that.

Anyway...both those are repurposes to a degree...I can’t see them opening country ______ on a new pad solo...

But it’s just a hunch....backed by 32 years of history
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It isn't tremendously enlightening. But it's "enlightening enough" to attract many people to WDW who consider fairy tale and superhero based attractions to be too frivolous to justify a vacation in Orlando.

My sister-in-law for example who teaches French in high school. She loves reading and international travel visiting cathedrals, castles, museums and stuff. Epcot with its faux France and fake Germany was the only WDW park she really enjoyed. There are a lot of people like that, who are embarrassed to tell their friends they went on a vacation mostly to see Mickey Mouse and Star Wars characters. But sipping wine and watching mimes and whatever is just their thing.
And variety insulates the property from any general change in audience tastes...things ebb and flow but SOMETHING is always there as a draw
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom