It wasn't a shot against you -- I just found it funny that it could be taken either way. Nobody is ragging on you. Read it again yourself from the other point of view. If you don't find that funny, sorry I accidently hurt your feelings. If you do find it funny, welcome to the club. Again it wasn't meant to be a mean post, sorry it sounded that way.
Yes, some of their choices are wrong. I get that. I just don't suffer under the delusion I could run the parks better.According to you, right? Because that sure isn't the case with me and others I know.
I always get a good laugh at the disdain shown to upper management...as if these educated people make all of their decisions in a vacuum.
I say bring on Project Gemeni and scrap SSE too. I'd rather have Horizons than that boring snorefest. I know it's deep and means something. Means something boring.
Sorry again, the whole thing makes me kinda sick too. Guess people can feel as brave as they want behind the veil of the internet.Not a problem and no offense taken.
I have been known to be as sarcastic as any here, but it wasn't my intent, so I wanted to make that clear. After rereading, I still find it hard to take both ways...then again, having written it ruins my objectivity.
PS Part of the problem may be that I didn't want it to link to the little pi$$ing match that was going on....
Soarin is a clone (I hate it as stated before), Missions: Space half baked ride to please thrill junkies (I hate it too), Test Track the only acceptable thrill ride out of the 3 put into Epcot. Finding Nemo (I'm support due to it brought back the seacabs in a way), Laugh Floor (I'm not too happy with because it replaced Time Keeper and doesn't belong in Tomorrowland), and Stitch is half baked, not too well planned out and isn't what I'd call a show kids could really enjoy without being afraid of the dark and sudden noises. What I'm saying is, why can't we have some new additions that are not character based and not an e ticket all in one again. Answetr I always get its not what sells. Well you know what, Walt and the Imagineers DID NOT go by what the people wanted, people wen't in and loved what he and his imagineers created for Disneyland, by putting in all these character based attractions they are ruining the parks and their image and not to mention storylines. And by puting in more of them isn't helping it! The people going to the parks for the first time now a days are gonna think all Dinsey can do is put movie based attractions in their parks and not think there was more than that in the past. I am ok with a few every now and then but its not right when everything coming out of WDI is nothing but Characters. If by doing nothing but throwing logs in the fire is all that Disney is going to do then they need a real wake up call. Why can't we have maybe some new countries in World Showcase? Why can't we have the original Enchanted Tiki room back? Why can't Disney put something better in the 20k lot than a cheap playground? Why can't Disney come up with any original ideas anymore is the real question. Whatever happened to the imagination in Imagineering? Eisner has been gone for awhile now and though i have seen alot of improvements at the parks its still not enough. So why can't Disney create great originals like the Haunted Mansion or Horizons? Because they choose not too, simple as that.
My source (who is also reliable) told me that all 4 park VP's are out, new blood is coming in. Brad Rex has allegedly already received an offer elsewhere.
her name is Beth Stevens
Everest isn't new anymore! Get over it. It opened over a year ago and there have been alot of new addtions that have opened after it. Sure its original and I don't mention it because its not new anymore and its a e ticket. If you had read what I said before Why can't we have an original attraction that isn't character based and not an e ticket than you wouldn't have mentioned Everest would you?.
My appologies for thinking that an attaction that is 365 days old is not 'new'. I will not make that mistake again. You're probably right. Disney should build a non-character attraction every 3 months. Then I'd go a lot more. I'm sure that's what everyone here is thinking too. Thank you for setting me straight, I appreciate it.
Wouldn't that potentially bankrupt Disney and cause the parks to implode in a cloud of popularity? You know, a new attraction every 364 days (cause you know that everything over 365 days is old, especially a 15 year old brat).