News Bob Iger is back! Chapek is out!!

ctrlaltdel

Well-Known Member
While investors like optimizing money makers, they certainly need to see some large future investments as well to get excited about. Otherwise you live and die only on the quarterly results. Chapek clearly died with that last quarterly report. I think that ultimately the Board/investors saw there was nothing Chapek was looking at as a long-term strategy, just cost-cutting and price gouging to the limit on Disney's current big money maker: parks. But there is nothing in the pipeline there, nothing to keep investors engaged, it's all wait patiently for a few years before Disney+ supposedly turns a profit. Very perilous way to run a company whose main competitor in their actual moneymaking industry is seeing record profits and a massive theme park on the way.

With weakening demand in the parks evident and streaming's stock boost no longer a premium it was time to quickly cut the cord. Streaming-wise, Disney is in a solid position with the amount of subs, but they desperately need price increases (on the way) and cutting back content costs/shifting movies back to theatrical.

It's completely obvious, but Iger is miles better at the actual back room dealing than Chapek and is completely willing to make splashy purchases/investments to build excitement among investors. Think his priorities are likely:

1. Try to get theatrical/streaming mix back on track. The mix is off, and it is clear that too many movies that could be decent hits theatrically are going straight to D+, which has very little value add compared to a TV show.
2. Do everything he can to use his connections to get China back in the fold and repair that relationship.
3. Appease the parks fans with some rollbacks of Chapek-era initiatives (convinced the actual moneymaking stuff won't be cut like Genie, but park reservations will be axed, park hopping anytime will be reinstated, etc.) and announcing some big investments there to generate excitement both among fans and investors.
4. Look for another big potential purchase, could be another studio/streamer.
 

monothingie

Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.
Premium Member
You have to consider that Iger negoiations have been on-going for weeks if not months.
If that were the case, they would have silenced Chapek and reduced his exposure weeks if not months ago.

This happened very quickly (for a company that moves as glacially as Disney this may have given some whiplash), I think the Q4 earnings fiasco was the lynch pin to trigger the change.
 

durangojim

Well-Known Member
So do any of the trades have the behind the scenes story yet on how this all went down? Also will Iger be brining his team back like Zenia Mucha?
 

Communicora

Premium Member
I mean it was a TV-14 Marvel show, so... no.


Most likely scenario is BLANK wins the primary, BLANK runs 3rd party, and BLANK BLANK wins 400 electoral votes.

As a BLANK-BLANK BLANK, this is all deeply depressing.

No politics, please

No Way Baby GIF by MOODMAN
 

ctrlaltdel

Well-Known Member
So do any of the trades have the behind the scenes story yet on how this all went down? Also will Iger be brining his team back like Zenia Mucha?
CNBC said that Chapek was only informed last night (presumably time enough to craft a statement on his exit) and that Iger was reached out to on Friday. Incredibly quick but this was clearly brewing with the Board for some time.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Just read the note that Wall Street is hoping Iger brings some of that parks strategy to Disney+:

Nathanson then outlined possible changes under Iger. “We would hope and expect that Mr. Iger examines the investment plans at Disney+ and re-focuses their investment on areas of franchise strength and away from broader general entertainment content,” he wrote. “In other words, Disney+, and Disney’s shareholders, could probably do better with fewer end-state subscribers made up of super fans willing to pay high revenue per user, which would generate much higher margins.”

I know I'm in the wrong place to ask but... is this a brand that's actually trying to appeal to CHILDREN anymore?

Originally, D+ was going to be for the niche family market. Then D+ blew through its four year projection in one month. Both Bobs were astounded that over half of the D+ subbers were households without children.

And so, they pivoted. D+ wasn't going to be a 2 quadrant streamer, but a 4 quadrant. So, they started to put more mature content on D+. Added a child lock. Decided to eventually merge D+ with Hulu rather than have them go after different markets.

This made them adjust their goal to be one of the big streamers after the streaming wars were over.

And those who were subbed to D+ were telling them in surveys that they wanted more "general audience" (i.e. 'adult') content.

So, D+ (along with the eventual Hulu merger) will be a 4 quadrant streamer.

Recommending them to double down on going back to being a niche market streamer is crazy.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
A yaaas queen fourth-wave feminist fable featuring internet fanboys as the primary antagonist is an unforgivable premise when your job is to sell content to internet fanboys.
Funny thing is that She-Hulk get pretty good ratings from critics. But general audience (self-selecting at RT and IMDB) give it a 44%.

It's almost as if half the population couldn't get on board.

;)
 

matt9112

Well-Known Member
When Iger was questioned on stockholder calls accusing him and the company of being 'too woke,' his response was, to paraphrase, "We don't see these issues as a right or left issue, we see it as a human issue."

A far cry more diplomatic than the hot water Chapek got himself in.

And the Scarlett Johansson debacle would have never happened under Iger.

He’s more personable for sure.
So you mean the circle of life?
Every time humanity has tried to be the ones to control things we end up creating a new disease or throwing things off balance and eliminate a species.
-Introduce a mosquito to eliminate
something then we got a new mosquito spreading virus.
hunting for sports should not be necessary for animal or disease control if we let nature take care of it.
If we hadn’t decimated certain animals that hunt and help species population we wouldn’t have that problem instead some prey over populate and spreads disease

It’s the same issue in many contries where hunting for sports or hunting because someone decides to move somewhere where there is wildlife and are surprised that they might kill their stock or pet.
Hunting should be done as a means for survival not as a means for sport or to prove to someone that they big cojones.

I have a neighbor that gets so annoyed because raccoons, possums, deer go in his property and eat their plants. I told him once, you are the idiot that moved next to a nature reserve. LOL

Why does he not shoot the critters? Legitimately what suppressed 22LR is for.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom