AEfx
Well-Known Member
Are people really so naive that they don't understand that those programs didn't just pop out of nowhere, and were well in development under Iger (even the stuff they hauled out using COVID as an excuse to finally launch)?For the people thinking this move will lead to Iger jettisoning Genie+ and ILL and other revenue-generating parks changes -- you are dreaming. There is no reason Disney would ditch those revenue streams at a time when other segments of the company were piling up scary enough results that the CEO got fired.
I certainly understand the Chapek hate, but have some perspective and do not equate Iger being back to "everything I wanted to happen in the parks will happen now!"
Just read the note that Wall Street is hoping Iger brings some of that parks strategy to Disney+:
Nathanson then outlined possible changes under Iger. “We would hope and expect that Mr. Iger examines the investment plans at Disney+ and re-focuses their investment on areas of franchise strength and away from broader general entertainment content,” he wrote. “In other words, Disney+, and Disney’s shareholders, could probably do better with fewer end-state subscribers made up of super fans willing to pay high revenue per user, which would generate much higher margins.”
This is what all the streamers are learning. Initially they sought to be a "jack of all trades" and attempted to make themselves one-stop-shops when that just doesn't make sense because they just can't keep up with that much original content. This is why HBO Max is pulling back from Kids/Family programming, and Disney+ is refocusing on it. Families have proven they will subscribe to 2-3 services for various things, and Disney+ will hopefully just start doing more of what they do best.