Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Refute…oh “insider”And this post of full of speculation
Refute…oh “insider”And this post of full of speculation
You cannot possibly know that the timing of Iger’s retirement was due to his fear of the pandemic’s effects on the business.Refute…oh “insider”
It’s funny how both he and McCarthy were “hostages” AFTER chapek got fired, isn’t it?
But never before
Exactly. If you think about it, it was a brilliant plan by Iger. Create a mess, add in Covid, select an incompetent CEO, and then point the finger at Chapek for all, pretend to come back ready to save the day from the bed he mostly made himself.Had Covid not happened, I fully believe Iger never would have left. He stepped back for a brief time and let Chapek take the heat while he continued to lurk in the shadows continuing to dictate company policy (again the company was only actually Iger-less for about 11 months).
I also feel that as long as he doesn't sense another disaster incoming, Iger will attempt to remain on for as long as the board keeps voting him back in. I don't buy the "temporary" nature of his return, or that there's any actual succession plan in development.
And this post of full of speculation
I know nothing…You cannot possibly know that the timing of Iger’s retirement was due to his fear of the pandemic’s effects on the business.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and speculation but none of us here know what really happened.
Some here are buying the narrative that Iger was 100% responsible for Chapek- we have no idea how much say Iger had in that decision.
This latest article makes it sound like Iger never liked Chapek for the job at all. It’s just a bunch of speculation.
It’s not only “possible”…but highly likely that they all suckExplains the whole “Let’s talk blue sky because we have no idea what will be greenlit or by whom!” presentation at D23.
…follow the breadcrumbsI typed out, and immediately deleted, a similar reply to avoid the fray.
Sir Walters theory is as likely as anyones but it’s 100% conjecture, not a fact.
Other than Iger, his family, and the board none of us has a clue if our theories about Iger leaving are right or wrong, and it’s likely a bit of all our theories... but none of us can state any of our theories are fact.
The Woman Behind the Mouse
Disney has thrived under the leadership of chief financial officer Christine McCarthy ’77. But her career and life haven’t always been a fairy tale.www.smith.edu
…follow the breadcrumbs
The problem with Disney fans is that they only believe a yutz in a name tag at a podium…and are under the ridiculously false assertion that they can’t lie.
So conjecture? Yes.
Does they events lead to reasonable conclusion to serious people?
You decide.
Your narrative fills in between actual facts with soap opera-level drama. To make your story (that you’ve repeated many times in this thread) work:I know nothing…
But here’s a timeline for you
By the admission of former senior us officials…the government was aware of the potential threat/spread potential of sars Covid 19 no LATER than December 2019…
Which means business knew 6 minutes later
Iger announces “retirement effective immediately” after news dump on February 26,2020. Not a peep about transition.
The United States, nato and the Far East industrial centers were in lockdown on 3/16/2020.
Iger then “comes back” when stock market doesn’t crash and spends a year trying to lean on Arnold and the Board
Sherlock Holmes would tell you NOT to believe in such “coincidences”
Do the math. Global lockdown and disruption should have tanked the financial system. Bob couldn’t stomach that after 6 years of “legacy building” (after 10 years of gouging and suck)
And even if you can’t follow the events from a practical standpoint…Iger never had a successor…he had a yutz.
And that’s iger’s fault
I don't "think" Iger planned it this way per se. I do think Iger wanted out as covid hit so he could leave at the top as an inevitable downturn was occurring.Your narrative fills in between actual facts with soap opera-level drama. To make your story (that you’ve repeated many times in this thread) work:
I think Iger had hits and misses. I don’t just believe everything (anything?) out of Disney’s PR machine, but I’m also not going to write an entire soap opera story arc about it.
- Iger alone would have to determine the timing of his retirement. But it doesn’t seem likely that the board would have brought him back if there was bad blood for leaving them in the lurch just as the pandemic broke out.
- Iger alone “hand” picked Chapek. As though the board had no say, and as if Iger was free to choose anyone in the world to succeed him as CEO.
- Iger ran the company with an iron fist prior to his first retirement (since you keep saying Chapek’s blunders were entirely Iger’s). But Execs, WDI, and CMs are celebrating Iger’s return.
- Iger gets all the blame for everything wrong with Disney, and none of the credit for anything good.
I’m willing to think Iger’s concern about his own legacy might lead him to come back with a very different perspective than he had before.
I don't "think" Iger planned it this way per se. I do think Iger wanted out as covid hit so he could leave at the top as an inevitable downturn was occurring.
BUT - Iger DID handpick Chapek AND Iger was (and is) on the board AND Iger maintained creative control up until this last year.
So what, exactly, has Iger changed from Chapek's current business practices?
Park RSVPs are still in effect.
Park ticket prices are still increasing.
No changes to the movie/TV slate.
Annual passes haven't come back...
If Chapek was doing everything so badly in the business then why has the 'business' not changed?
I don't understand why people think Bob is out there running the day to day operations of the parks. They are making money, they are packed and that is all he needs to know for now. Rebuilding relationships with government and creatives to get the next tentpole out to help prop up D+ and legislators looking in other directions are his focus not if you have to get up at 7am for your ressie or to pick what ride you want to "do" for the 100th time.Bob Iger has held the power to immediately enact ANY of the following policies the exact moment he returned-
- Improve basic daily/nightly park maintenance and cleanliness
- Get rid of park reservations
- Remove paid Genie+
- Lower prices on tickets/merch/food/etc
Park reservations are the only complaint Iger even responded to. He also didn't answer, saying he's never used them (you don't say) and knows nothing about them, but he'd talk to D'Amaro about it (that means no for those who aren't fluent in BS corporate speak). Maintenance cuts and price hikes have been Iger's bread and butter at WDW LONG before Chapek held any sort of power over the parks. The monetization of Genie+ has also been a long term plan all the way back when "nextgen" was being developed. It makes them money, they're not getting rid of it.
Iger isn't going to fix these complaints, nor does he warrant any sort of "time" to prove this. He could have done so at any moment if he wanted. We've had years of experience to see how he views and treats the parks and guests. It wasn't any different than Chapek. There are no unknowns. If anything, things are going to get even worse. The parks always take the bullet whenever there are losses and failures to be covered for elsewhere in the company.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.