Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
That’s exactly what I thought when I read it…McKinsey being brought in would have set off alarm bells on Wall Street. They are destroyers. No wonder they kept them hidden.
Full stop.
That’s exactly what I thought when I read it…McKinsey being brought in would have set off alarm bells on Wall Street. They are destroyers. No wonder they kept them hidden.
McKinsey dissects the body, retains the valuable parts then discards things perceived of no value.McKinsey being brought in would have set off alarm bells on Wall Street. They are destroyers. No wonder they kept them hidden.
It set records when it was released because people were wowed by that level of CGI.Would it?
I don't think it will do $2 billion, but it's not like the first Avatar was an especially good movie and it still set records.
Yes but when the Pandemic was going on when they released new movies they made them an add-on to watch for the first few months. They have since completely dropped that.Disney didn't "follow Netflix," they did the only think they could have done IN A PANDEMIC when theaters were literally closed.
Dr gigglesMcKinsey dissects the body, retains the valuable parts then discards things perceived of no value.
I Believe that was a contract brick wall…if there was money in it…they’d be doing itYes but when the Pandemic was going on when they released new movies they made them an add-on to watch for the first few months. They have since completely dropped that.
That is true to a point. There are a lot of people like myself, I'm sure, that because the turn to D+ is so quick. You will just wait if it's a movie you're on the fence about. The next movies I will see in the theater are guardians 3 for sure and most likely antman. I'm not invested enough to go see Avatar so I'll just wait. Now if I knew a movie wasn't going to be streaming for 6 to 8 months I might go to the theater more. Of course then they'd need to step up the tv game or I just wouldn't have D+ except for a couple months a year.Will some people just go "oh I'll wait for it to come out on Disney+"? Sure, but thats the same group of people that would happily wait for it to pop up on TV a year or two down the line and watch it then.
Unfortunately I don't see anything all the original coming out of D+ anytime soon. Disney is so deep in the weeds with their lack of creativity, I don't see the talent there to pull it off. If it's not tied to a main franchise or a reboot/update, there just isn't much hope.if you arent wanting to consume Marvel or Star Wars based shows theres not a huge amount to keep you around for very long. They either need some new franchises, or an extremely popular show that isn't part of the two main properties. Think Game of Thrones or Doctor Who level of draw.
…to this point…we’ve passed on wakanda…That is true to a point. There are a lot of people like myself, I'm sure, that because the turn to D+ is so quick. You will just wait if it's a movie you're on the fence about. The next movies I will see in the theater are guardians 3 for sure and most likely antman. I'm not invested enough to go see Avatar so I'll just wait. Now if I knew a movie wasn't going to be streaming for 6 to 8 months I might go to the theater more. Of course then they'd need to step up the tv game or I just wouldn't have D+ except for a couple months a year.
Unfortunately I don't see anything all the original coming out of D+ anytime soon. Disney is so deep in the weeds with their lack of creativity, I don't see the talent there to pull it off. If it's not tied to a main franchise or a reboot/update, there just isn't much hope.
Agreed but what they are doing now isn't working either.I Believe that was a contract brick wall…if there was money in it…they’d be doing it
….eh…to be fair…he’s made 6 movies and taken forever. He does chose his spots.I feel as if people are sleeping on Avatar a bit… Avatar is going to get people out that never go to the movies…my mid 70’s parents plan on seeing Avatar and they never go to the theater
I believe Avatar will be that rare leggy movie…you
May not not see it on Disney plus for at least 6 months as more and more people catch FOMO from talks of have to see it in a theater…plus it will pack premium theaters as people state it is the only way to see it
Oh and James Cameron has never made a bad film since the original Terminator
I feel as if people are sleeping on Avatar a bit… Avatar is going to get people out that never go to the movies…my mid 70’s parents plan on seeing Avatar and they never go to the theater
I believe Avatar will be that rare leggy movie…you
May not not see it on Disney plus for at least 6 months as more and more people catch FOMO from talks of have to see it in a theater…plus it will pack premium theaters as people state it is the only way to see it
Oh and James Cameron has never made a bad film since the original Terminator
Speaking as one of those that avoids theaters, other people tend to detract from the experience and at times, outright ruin it. Talking, using cell phones, rummaging around, people walking by going to and from the bathroom, etc.I’m really shocked by how many people don’t see movies as communal activities. Watching a film in a packed theater can be an immensely richer experience then watching one alone. Seeing Endgame with a full house, with the cheers, sobs, and laughter, is a completely different experience then viewing it alone, no matter the resolution of the screen. I genuinely regret not being able to watch No Way Home with a packed theater. Comedies in particular work so much better with a bunch of other folks laughing along.
It’s subjective, of course, but I don’t think I’m alone in feeling that shared moviegoing matters. I mean, it’s been the way we’ve viewed films for well over a century. It’s survived previous plagues, wars, suburbanization, the rise of TVs and VCRs… filmgoing has value as a shared experience.
Very tough to nail movies these days…Avatar will slay. You are in my opinion 100% correct in saying it'll be a movie event that brings people out in a way Top Gun: Maverick or the original Avatar did.
I imagine a big part of Love and Thunder outperforming Ragnarok is because of how awesome Ragnarok was.
Love and Thunder outperformed Ragnarok domestically and in every international market in which it was allowed to open. It’s total box office fell short of Ragnarok entirely because it wasn’t allowed to open in Russia or China. Wakanda Forever has no clear protagonist and is an ensemble film about grief. With that in mind it’s showing very strong legs with a very small third week drop. Star Wars has two critically and popularly acclaimed ongoing series, one with a huge cultural footprint, one in serious discussions as the best television program of the year. The franchise hasn’t had media this well received since 1983.
All entertainment ever made “pushes an agenda.” We’re just in an incredibly stupid phase of the culture war in which certain people are trying very hard to be offended.
Agreed…a common denominator I think just like Top Gun Maverick…Avatar will bring out the older generations…I also don’t expect it to play like a typical blockbuster like marvel and be so front loaded as older people are not the type to rush out opening night…My prediction is just like top gun it will play for monthsAvatar will slay. You are in my opinion 100% correct in saying it'll be a movie event that brings people out in a way Top Gun: Maverick or the original Avatar did.
Will some people just go "oh I'll wait for it to come out on Disney+"? Sure, but thats the same group of people that would happily wait for it to pop up on TV a year or two down the line and watch it then.
I'm not a big movie theater person, so keep that in mind when I say I would ALWAYS choose the option to see a movie at home instead of a theater, if I had a choice. People in public suck and don't give a crap about ruining the experience for the people around them. That generally applies for everything, including WDW, not just movies.I’m really shocked by how many people don’t see movies as communal activities. Watching a film in a packed theater can be an immensely richer experience then watching one alone. Seeing Endgame with a full house, with the cheers, sobs, and laughter, is a completely different experience then viewing it alone, no matter the resolution of the screen. I genuinely regret not being able to watch No Way Home with a packed theater. Comedies in particular work so much better with a bunch of other folks laughing along.
It’s subjective, of course, but I don’t think I’m alone in feeling that shared moviegoing matters. I mean, it’s been the way we’ve viewed films for well over a century. It’s survived previous plagues, wars, suburbanization, the rise of TVs and VCRs… filmgoing has value as a shared experience.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.