BLACK PANTHER huge hit!

smile

Well-Known Member
I will forever be fascinated by the Marvel contract that lets them do whatever they want at Disneyland, while at Disney World a giant star like Black Panther is Persona Non Grata.


makes perfect sense when you remember when that contract began and what the state of marvel was at the time - uni came up big for them...
twdc knew that full well going into purchase and said from the word go the contract would be honored; hasn't been touched since with a ten foot pole

obvious both companies have respected and continue to respect each others holdings - a messy legal squabble does neither any good

and yeah, from then to now not one word of the contract has changed to my knowledge... nothing new here
 

Kamikaze

Well-Known Member
makes perfect sense when you remember when that contract began and what the state of marvel was at the time - uni came up big for them...

Marvel wasn't their first choice. They had nearly made a deal with DC to build the land as 'Gotham City' prior to talks with Marvel.

and yeah, from then to now not one word of the contract has changed to my knowledge... nothing new here

Yes and no. The wording has not changed, but the enforced terms have. Mainly that since Uni didn't build anything at Uni Studios Hollywood, the 'shrinkage' clause kicked in, which is what allows DLR to use Marvel properties.

Since I don't know what "expert" you are talking about I can't comment further.

I assume he's talking about Spirit.

Funny for him to ****talk an 'expert/insider' when he pretends to be one himself.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
Marvel wasn't their first choice. They had nearly made a deal with DC to build the land as 'Gotham City' prior to talks with Marvel.



Yes and no. The wording has not changed, but the enforced terms have. Mainly that since Uni didn't build anything at Uni Studios Hollywood, the 'shrinkage' clause kicked in, which is what allows DLR to use Marvel properties.



I assume he's talking about Spirit.

Funny for him to ****talk an 'expert/insider' when he pretends to be one himself.

I have always said I am not an insider nor am I connected to anyone at Disney even by Kevin Bacon degrees of separation.
 

EvilChameleon

Well-Known Member
Marvel wasn't their first choice. They had nearly made a deal with DC to build the land as 'Gotham City' prior to talks with Marvel.



Yes and no. The wording has not changed, but the enforced terms have. Mainly that since Uni didn't build anything at Uni Studios Hollywood, the 'shrinkage' clause kicked in, which is what allows DLR to use Marvel properties.

How did you manage to quote something I've never posted?
 

smile

Well-Known Member
Marvel wasn't their first choice. They had nearly made a deal with DC to build the land as 'Gotham City' prior to talks with Marvel.
Yes and no. The wording has not changed, but the enforced terms have. Mainly that since Uni didn't build anything at Uni Studios Hollywood, the 'shrinkage' clause kicked in, which is what allows DLR to use Marvel properties.

first - why does it say evilchameleon? - did you edit that? if so, why? if not, ???

second, yes - marvel wasn't the first choice, but marvel themselves needed it badly
... and the dc/six flags relationship was there too

... then marvel just so happened to explode in the subsequent years...

if i'm not mistaken, character usage is ok at dlr, but still no 'marvel' however
 

Dutch Inn '76

Well-Known Member
I'd say it's not thinly veiled at all. It's explicitly political and the characters are motivated by world politics. That's a core theme of the entire film and extremely important.

I'm sure I'll enjoy the film, as I expect it to be political. I'm ready for it going in. I did NOT enjoy Happy Feet or that preachy Zootopia because they blindsided me with leftist propaganda. Most annoying...
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom