News 'Beyond Big Thunder Mountain' Blue Sky concept revealed for Magic Kingdom

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Sorry, but I have heard of Coco appearing in AK via the carousel, and from a legitimate source.

Can't fully guarantee that's the current state of things, but it's not based on nothing.
We have a source from earlier this week at a WDI presser....
Then came presentations by portfolio executives from Florida who provided new details about the plans for Tropical Americas in Animal Kingdom and Beyond Big Thunder at Magic Kingdom. This was the meatiest portion of the presentation, with new substantive details about the Dino-Rama replacement featuring Indiana Jones, Encanto, and Coco plus brand-new concept art for the area.



But this is the BBTM thread. I posted that in the DAK Expansion thread...

Totally fair! As I said, I was never saying it was impossible, just that, up until this point, it seemed people were speculating from nondescript artwork and a YouTube video or two that mentioned it without sourcing it at all. If there are genuine rumblings about it, I'm actually quite happy to stop feeling the need to say anything to the contrary.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Totally fair! As I said, I was never saying it was impossible, just that, up until this point, it seemed people were speculating from nondescript artwork and a YouTube video or two that mentioned it without sourcing it at all. If there are genuine rumblings about it, I'm actually quite happy to stop feeling the need to say anything to the contrary.
Now you jinxed it!!

Disney will surely now not make it Coco themed because we're now expecting it!!!
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
WDW I believe will always want MK to be the crown jewel of parks. They don't want, nor do i believe should they, want to try to have AK/EPCOTT/HS be brought up to the same level of MK.
They want parks that will command premiums for G+, ILL, After Hours, and assorted upcharge add ons.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
I see this come up in other threads as speculation, but I don't see Liberty Square going away anytime soon.

While I'm sure there are some within Disney who view it as problematic, at this point the 1790s theme is mostly just set dressing for restaurants. The land only has two gift shops left, and they're basically the Halloween and Christmas stores. Haunted Mansion is one of the park's most popular rides, the Riverboat isn't really integral to the theme and while Hall of Presidents is an obvious target, I really don't see Disney wanting to start the kind of backlash they'd get for closing it or The American Adventure.

It being sandwiched between three other lands means it's also difficult to expand, and what would really be gained by spending the money to redecorate? Disney went to a lot of trouble to put The Liberty Tree where it is now, they're not going to try and move it again.
 

Phicinfan

Well-Known Member
Question, just to clear up some things. The proposed Moana ride in Adventure land - is that targeted for the expansion pad near Pirates? So this will finally kill the Fire Mountain rumors of possibly going there?
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
While I'm sure there are some within Disney who view it as problematic, at this point the 1790s theme is mostly just set dressing for restaurants. The land only has two gift shops left, and they're basically the Halloween and Christmas stores. Haunted Mansion is one of the park's most popular rides, the Riverboat isn't really integral to the theme and while Hall of Presidents is an obvious target, I really don't see Disney wanting to start the kind of backlash they'd get for closing it or The American Adventure.

Yup total minefield. Disney can't do anything there without being screwed over. Wall it off and build a DVC lounge so that everyone will be united in hating it.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
This thinking boggles my mind. If you have valuable and popular IP, why would you think you need to concentrate it in only one park/area? Why would you not say, we have 2 great ideas for rides, lets expand our offering at more than 1 park, so there is a positive gain and hopefully driving more traffic to both parks? If you have great IP, why wouldn't you want to spread it to more than one park, so that if you have families who are true fans of that IP, they now make it a priority to go to both parks on their next trip, or at least pay for park hoppers, as opposed to saying, well they just put the new things we love to see in one park, we can skip another park this year and just go see the stuff.

I think you missed his point.

It wasn't that they shouldn't ever put the same IP in multiple parks (although that is a bit silly, considering how much IP they have and how much of it is unused) -- it's that it doesn't make much sense to build two attractions based on the exact same conceit from the same IP at the same time.

Imagine they built Flight of Passage at Pandora while also building a banshee spinner at DHS at roughly the same time. It would make a lot more sense to use a different IP for the spinner.
 

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Imagine if they built a Nemo ride at Epcot at the same time as they were making a Nemo show at DAK. Imagine they write new songs for the show and include one in the ride. And then imagine the only complaint is, “I wish the ride was an E-ticket.”
I still think it's weird to build two Coco-towns at the same time in two different parks. Imagine the D23 pitch: "Enter new lands in Animal Kingdom and Magic Kingdom, both themed to Coco, both opening in 2029!" It's just a little too much Coco in my opinion.
 

The Leader of the Club

Well-Known Member
I still think it's weird to build two Coco-towns at the same time in two different parks. Imagine the D23 pitch: "Enter new lands in Animal Kingdom and Magic Kingdom, both themed to Coco, both opening in 2029!" It's just a little too much Coco in my opinion.
What if MK’s Coco Land is the Land of the Dead while DAK’s Coco area is the land of the living?
 

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
They wouldn’t announce it like that.
I know they wouldn't announce it like that, but that would be the reality of what they're doing. It just seems like a whole lot of investment in an IP that will be over 12 years old by the time it opens (realistically). Is the Coco-love that strong in the GP?
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
I know they wouldn't announce it like that, but that would be the reality of what they're doing. It just seems like a whole lot of investment in an IP that will be over 12 years old by the time it opens (realistically). Is the Coco-love that strong in the GP?
Apparently.

The carousel fits.

And at MK, a Mexico-themed Frontierland is safer than a cowboys and Indians land. Plus, I’d love good Mexican food in the park…
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom