I could care less about cost. Just spend the money like they do in the international parks.
Historically, the difference is it was someone else's money (partially, largely, or completely) being spent in the international parks for making them better.
Since Imagineering was effectively charging and/or invoicing for their services, they were
kind of "making" money for Disney Co. this way and getting someone else to help fund their own development and research in the process.
Our Rat was still overpriced but Disney likely wouldn't have even bothered if OLC hadn't helped pay for their initial forays into trackless ride systems with development of the original rat ride then going in the DLP budget.
Maybe we would have still gotten trackless ride systems like MMRR and Rise here eventually wtihout Pooh's Hunny Hunt and Aquatopia... or maybe not.
Same with Tron. It may be costing way more than it should but if the original development hadn't been partially bankrolled by the People's Republic of China*, do you think we'd be seeing it?
Credit where it is due, CRW seems to be a domestic original both in their use of a ride system and in theme and also not an apparent
direct response to any competitor's threats but it's also missing a lot that people think it should have (like real animatronics somewhere and a good story for the "first ever storytelling coaster" that at least matches what competitors have already done in that arena) and a hideous, un-hidable show building.
*Okay, technically it's the Shanghai Shendi Group but guess who owns them?