ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
Iād call it The Island of Misfit Toys.They could open up a 5th gate. Failed Kingdom. It would likely feature more recent films tho
Last edited:
Iād call it The Island of Misfit Toys.They could open up a 5th gate. Failed Kingdom. It would likely feature more recent films tho
i agree, i think they are trying too hard to make everything immersive. why does it have to be a land, can it be an area like New Orleans square? that would fit in with the princess and Frog remake of splash mountain. im just hoping its not another expanded fantasy land in terms of squeezing in rides. they needed the space but it seems the rides could have been a lot better. could also use another sit down restuarant, like blue bayou.You just proved one of my points. Itās a setting for a ārideā, not a land with multiple attractions. Disney already overspends on things, every new thing doesnāt have to be in an overpriced land for itself
there are also many other fan favorite movies that could use attractions so why limit things by building a land taking up more real estate than necessary
i agree, i think they are trying too hard to make everything immersive. why does it have to be a land, can it be an area like New Orleans square? that would fit in with the princess and Frog remake of splash mountain. im just hoping its not another expanded fantasy land in terms of squeezing in rides. they needed the space but it seems the rides could have been a lot better. could also use another sit down restuarant, like blue bayou.
What's the difference between a "land" and an "area?"i agree, i think they are trying too hard to make everything immersive. why does it have to be a land, can it be an area like New Orleans square? that would fit in with the princess and Frog remake of splash mountain. im just hoping its not another expanded fantasy land in terms of squeezing in rides. they needed the space but it seems the rides could have been a lot better. could also use another sit down restuarant, like blue bayou.
How about they just not waste anymore money than necessary and just build more capacity at each parkā¦more rides and shows asap.What's the difference between a "land" and an "area?"
When I talk about a place being "immersive," I just mean that it has internally consistent and realistic theming. Seems like the question is "where should the consistent theming stop?" --at the entrance to the attraction? At the pathway leading up to the attraction? Should there be a gift shop themed to the attraction? What about restrooms? Should CMs have costumes themed to the attraction, or more generally to the "land" or collection of attractions?
In planning, designing, and building internally consistent themed places, I don't think it's possible for Disney to "try too hard."
What do you think has kept them from doing this?How about they just not waste anymore money than necessary and just build more capacity at each parkā¦more rides and shows asap.
Does the Beauty and the Beast stuff in Fantasyland even qualify as its own land? Isn't it actually a subland?Toy Story? Avatar? Dumbo? Beauty and the Beast? Star Wars?
I thought it was only two made-for-TV specials.I think building a land around Toy Story was a mistake (especially as it was executed), but there's plenty of content to support the idea: four movies, several shorts, 3 or 4 made for tv specials...
Whatās the difference between a āland,ā and āarea,ā and a āsub-land?āDoes the Beauty and the Beast stuff in Fantasyland even qualify as its own land? Isn't it actually a subland?
I thought it was only two made-for-TV specials.
Theyāre saying ābased on a single movie,ā youāre saying ābased on a single IP.āDiagon Alley at Universal and Hogsmeade at IOA would be considered great success, no? Both lands(?) or areas based on a single IP.
Coco can do it. There is an enormous fanbase out there for it. Every year they play Coco in the park and it's standing room only.
Not saying they will or even should do this, but it most certainly can be done.
Theyāre saying ābased on a single movie,ā youāre saying ābased on a single IP.ā
I agree with you. I donāt understand the desire to determine the worthiness of an IP for a āland/areaā based on how well a movie did. To me, the better way to decide is āwould this IP make a great attraction and themed place?āOkay. I think they can build a land, if done correctly, based on a single movie like Coco. It practically built itself in the movie. I already described above just the start of what they could put in it.
Like all of us, Iāve long-dreamed of a $1 billion The Black Cauldron land. I plan to ask Bob about this at the next shareholder meeting.
Theyāll do that around the same time they build the John Carter-land lol
Santa Cecilia
The Roman Virgin Martyr?
It should be based on the Land of The Dead, where most of the movie took place.
And it shall be calledā¦Latinx (+villains!) Land.I'm struggling to understand where the notion that this "land" would be based on just one movie came from anyway. Just as Liberty Square is based on colonial America and Frontierland is themed around the American frontier, the concept art for the area these two attractions would occupy looked like a more generalized postcolonial plaza that could conceivably host a number of attractions and meet-and-greets centered on the Latin American experience.
poor management and decision makingWhat do you think has kept them from doing this?
Makes complete sense for the magic kingdom (facepalm)And it shall be calledā¦Latinx (+villains!) Land.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.