I was replying to the statement that frame rates below 30 cause nasuea, etc. and is somehow herky-jerky - as I said, it's been 24fps for quite some time and somehow the majority of us have survived. Comparing fps on a video game vs. film is a completely different beast.
As to the film experience, I could go on for quite a few pages about it, but I'll try to summarize - many of those things you listed are a far cry from 60fps. Some, like 3-D, have also been pushed for business reasons more than to benefit the film viewer. Digital projection, for example - few people can tell the difference (and, personally, I go to the movies to see film not video, but I digress), it's mostly so studios don't have to keep printing, distributing, and maintaining actual physical film. 3-D was because they saw how much Pixar films were making in IMAX and that they could charge a tax. 70MM is neat but considered too costly for most uses and simply isn't appropriate for most films.
Sound and color were obvious technical developments that were huge to the public - but 60 FPS? I mean, rarely do people come out of films saying, "Wow, that just wasn't fluid enough..."
We are getting way off topic now, but I guess we can come back to this when 60FPS actually becomes a reality for mainstream film - and that anyone but computer gamers actually know what it is.
