That's great. I ,however, do care how long the construction timetable is. It has a direct impact on park capacity and in the case of DAK, operating hours. Of course, the real issue of the construction timeline is that it's absurdly long. As mentioned before, this is done strictly for financial reporting. While that may not be an issue for you, many are not thrilled with this slow pace.
You only have to look at the Vikings stadium demolition and construction to realize how slow Disney as at these things when compared to Disney Springs or anything else they've built recently. Even on a re-theme, its crazy long. (Maelstrom closed OCT 5th 2014 and Frozen opened June 26th 2016). In fact, Disney built another theme park in China from April 2011 until its opening this year June 16th. A whole park vs one land. No sense of urgency. Again, as I mentioned, it's because there is no financial incentive to build faster (not yet, but attendance may change their minds). People still go for stale attractions and abandoned concepts.
This is very true and very well said. The next time you go to the park (DHS), really count the rides (or "attractions" if you prefer) you experience. Then add up the money you spent on food, transportation, admission and lodging for that day. For fun, divide that number by your number of experiences. Was DHS worth your money. Probably not. For the money, MK is probably the best choice despite it's very weak food offerings.
Beyond any of that, progress for this land is just slow. It's slow by design. It is just limiting this parks potential and keeping MK busier than it has to be. Adding attractions and capacity by doing so, relieves the other parks on property. Not refreshing or renewing drives visitors elsewhere. Well... it's starting to anyway.... When the bottom line starts to take a hit, it will reveal the missed opportunities for growth.
*1023*