No, I love Stitch, and in fact WDW has become my favourite disney park in large part because of the huge stitch presence there.
I really do love it.
Problem is I see Disney burning this character out and that alarms me a great deal. Because as a diehard Stitch fan I want to see him last for decades. The way disney is pushing him means that he's been steered in the direction of a fad...where everyone is crazuy about it one minute, then gets sick of it and dumps it the next. I don't want that happening to Stitch. Not at all.
More alarming to me is that people who are disappointed with SGE are now turning on the character HIMSELF. It used to be that Stitch was rarely spoken ill of, or at least that's what I saw. But now everyone here seems to be bent on bashing Stitch. For a person like me, that's heartbreaking. It's like, because of bad planning on the part of disney management, people are hating the character that they once liked or loved.
I just think disney needs to get its foot off the gas pedal for a while, and let people adjust to the new stitch exposure in the park, instead of constantly heaping on more. We're not giving people enough time to actually appreciate his presence and instead we're burning him out. That's to the detriment of Disney...because a burnt out character cannot move all that new merchandise they keep coming out with for him.
Now the merch isn't a problem. They can keep introducing new Stitch merch and that's fine, I don't see people complaining about that because they have a CHOICE to not buy the stitch merch. (Though I have seen a few people complain that some stores have been converted into Stitch emporiums, but I think they need to get over it.)
It's the stuff people don't have a choice in that they're upset about. Stitch on the monorails, Stitch at the gates, Stitch here, there, all over the place. Some of us are in absolute heaven at seeing it all. Considering that back in 2002 we didn't even know if this character had a future. Some, who didnt see the movie or didn't like the character, are going nuts over it. They hate it.
There is a happy medium. disney has not found it.
If I had my way Stitch would be everywhere, in every park, because that's something that makes my WDW experience all the better. But, MY way would ultimately pi ss a lot of people off too! Not everyone wants a Stitchland, but I do!
My thoughts are these:
1. Don't dis on it until you've seen it for yourself. Until then it's just hearsay you're going on and I don't think that's a fair way to judge an attraction. Give it a chance before knocking it, even if you are 100% certain you'd hate the ride.
2. If you're tired of the Stitch overexposure in the parks, remember it's not the character's fault, it's management's fault for going overboard with it. Don't hate Stitch because of a bad management decision. That's not really fair.
3. If you hated SGE, please respect the opinions of those who did like it and do want a Stitch attraction in WDW. It doesn't mean we're idiots or clueless or that our opinion doesn't count. It counts as much as yours does. And like it or not, there are those of us that would be dead-set against an effort to remove Stitch from the parks.
4. Just because Stitch is overexposed doesn't mean he should be GONE. Disney does need to tone it down a bit, yes. But they shouldn't get rid of him. I'm glad he's at the parks. I think he's earned a wake up call for guests, mascots in all the parks except epcot, and a coming character breakfast. He's earned that. Let him have it. I've seen characters from far less successful movies get these same things, and I'd consider Stitch just as if not more deserving.
5. Lilo and Stitch was not a sub-par movie, and was not a failure. A lot of people like to use these arguments when stating why Stitch shouldn't be in the parks. It is factually wrong. Lilo and Stitch was a blockbuster. Its global earnings were nothing to scoff about, nor were its domestic earnings. It has been Disney's most successful movie of the 2000s, and post-Lion King, its earnings are second only to Tarzan, which, it could be argued, was a success mostly because of the Phil Collins score. Tarzan failed to produce a memorable character with longevity, and thus a limited franchise.
Stitch has produced what has the potential to be a modern icon if Disney plays its cards right. Stitch had produced a solid franchise that keeps on giving for Disney. Stitch has survived for 3 years in an industry where people hardly remember the movies they saw last summer or last year. We live in a society that has a very short memory, and tastes that change so rapidly that movies become obsolete almost instantly. Stitch has survived.
Do keep in mind that while Disney pushes this character, they can only do so much if the public doesn't respond. The public has responded. Stitch is a success.
Disney now has to make the right choices to ensure that Stitch remains successful. So whether you think Stitch is a "deserving" character or not, the FACT is that the movie was a success, the character was a success, the franchise is a success. It is now in Disney's hands to keep it that way, and the WRONG thing to do is push the franchise so hard that people start to get sick of it, and Stitch goes the way of beanie babies and cabbage patch dolls.
I hope they make the right choice and ease off the gas a bit, before they hurt this character's future. I love him, I want to see him last.