• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

EPCOT Announced: Mary Poppins Attraction in UK Pavilion

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
I figured this was the case. There were something like a half dozen projects at Epcot announced - SSE refurb, Moana thing, the event space in Future World, Harmonius, Mary Poppins, Canada and China circle vision, Remy, Guardians. I feel like weve had regular updates or announcements on all of those but Mary Poppins and SSE, with the later likely just delayed until they have the time/money else where.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It was a sequel. It took stories from the books that weren't in the first movie. Some of other Travers stories made it into the Daulton Music Hall show.

The children grew up.

Just because it had the same beats, doesn't make it a sequel. As your favorite director ever once said when repurposing the same story beats:
View attachment 564780
Not my favorite by far...

...gonna need heavier ammo to move my fat butt off this spot 😉
 
Last edited:

Haymarket2008

Well-Known Member
I figured this was the case. There were something like a half dozen projects at Epcot announced - SSE refurb, Moana thing, the event space in Future World, Harmonius, Mary Poppins, Canada and China circle vision, Remy, Guardians. I feel like weve had regular updates or announcements on all of those but Mary Poppins and SSE, with the later likely just delayed until they have the time/money else where.

That's the thing I am most surprised by: almost everything is moving forward except for the original iteration of the Festival Center and Mary Poppins. Both of which were highly divisive. So no loss there.

Only *announced* things left to get concrete info on are Wondrous China, SSE and what is happening with World Discovery (which seems to have been solidified but not revealed yet).
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
That's the thing I am most surprised by: almost everything is moving forward except for the original iteration of the Festival Center and Mary Poppins. Both of which were highly divisive. So no loss there.
Was Poppins divisive or just the slimmed down version? Genuinely curious. I think getting a full attraction would do wonders for beginning the process of balancing out World Showcase by putting two rides in the east, two in the west, a large theater show (American Adventure) in the center, and a couple of CircleVisions scattered about. IMO, it still needs probably two more rides and a refresh for Mexico, but it would really help flesh out that half of the park.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Was Poppins divisive or just the slimmed down version? Genuinely curious. I think getting a full attraction would do wonders for beginning the process of balancing out World Showcase by putting two rides in the east, two in the west, a large theater show (American Adventure) in the center, and a couple of CircleVisions scattered about. IMO, it still needs probably two more rides and a refresh for Mexico, but it would really help flesh out that half of the park.

I think the idea of a carousel, or even worse, an enchanted tales (which was apparently the final form) was divisive. An actual full Mary Poppins dark ride could be tremendously good.
 

TTA94

Well-Known Member
I figured this was the case. There were something like a half dozen projects at Epcot announced - SSE refurb, Moana thing, the event space in Future World, Harmonius, Mary Poppins, Canada and China circle vision, Remy, Guardians. I feel like weve had regular updates or announcements on all of those but Mary Poppins and SSE, with the later likely just delayed until they have the time/money else where.

One thing that hasn’t been announced yet, unless I missed it, is Coco replacing GFT.
 

Haymarket2008

Well-Known Member
Was Poppins divisive or just the slimmed down version? Genuinely curious. I think getting a full attraction would do wonders for beginning the process of balancing out World Showcase by putting two rides in the east, two in the west, a large theater show (American Adventure) in the center, and a couple of CircleVisions scattered about. IMO, it still needs probably two more rides and a refresh for Mexico, but it would really help flesh out that half of the park.

I think if you embrace/accept the inevitable IP centered additions of the park moving forward, Poppins wasn’t divisive. But where I think it WAS divisive was A) it being based on Mary Poppins Returns rather than the far more beloved and classic original, and B) it allegedly wasn’t a full experience or dark ride that we would expect from that property. It was most likely an off the shelf carnival ride or a deluxe meet and greet experience a la Enchanted Tales with Belle. Most, including me, felt that the project was a wasted opportunity.

If they want Poppins in the parks (or to continue to dilute Epcot) at least make it the best that it can be. Not skimped out on.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
I think if you embrace/accept the inevitable IP centered additions of the park moving forward, Poppins wasn’t divisive. But where I think it WAS divisive was A) it being based on Mary Poppins Returns rather than the far more beloved and classic original, and B) it allegedly wasn’t a full experience or dark ride that we would expect from that property. It was most likely an off the shelf carnival ride or a deluxe meet and greet experience a la Enchanted Tales with Belle. Most, including me, felt that the project was a wasted opportunity.

If they want Poppins in the parks (or to continue to dilute Epcot) at least make it the best that it can be. Not skimped out on.
A dark ride / trackless that simulates the freed carousel horses through setpieces in both films would have been wonderful.
 

Dunston

Well-Known Member
Of course this has been cancelled. Iger can't be bothered with an attraction based on Walt's greatest live-action achievement when the money can be better spent on on Marvel or Star Wars or one of Iger's other trash acquisitions. Ol' Bob sure put one over on Roy Disney when the latter agreed with making him CEO. Roy once said "Disney isn't a 'brand'!" But to Iger, Disney is nothing BUT a brand. The parks aren't innovative, imaginative creative entities; they're hubs for merchandising. What a living caricature of corporate greed Iger is, and unfortunately, he's remade the company in his own image...
This guy needs to calm down
 

mergatroid

Well-Known Member
Of course this has been cancelled. Iger can't be bothered with an attraction based on Walt's greatest live-action achievement when the money can be better spent on on Marvel or Star Wars or one of Iger's other trash acquisitions. Ol' Bob sure put one over on Roy Disney when the latter agreed with making him CEO. Roy once said "Disney isn't a 'brand'!" But to Iger, Disney is nothing BUT a brand. The parks aren't innovative, imaginative creative entities; they're hubs for merchandising. What a living caricature of corporate greed Iger is, and unfortunately, he's remade the company in his own image...
In fairness didn't he just recently sanction and have built MMRR at the Studios? I mean you can't get more iconic and traditional if you tried.
 

TTA94

Well-Known Member
Despite the fact that Coco absolutely deserves its own attraction, this was the right move. The pavilion can only really support a 3 Cab level experience. Mexico would have to be retooled far beyond recognition.

To bad they can’t expand Mexico and Norway and build a Coco attraction and a brand new FEA attraction. I do actually like FEA but the fact it’s a old attraction shows a lot especially with the bumps lol. Coco, Frozen, Poppins and Moana have big potentials to be awesome attractions. It’s a shame.
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
In fairness didn't he just recently sanction and have built MMRR at the Studios? I mean you can't get more iconic and traditional if you tried.
Maybe it'd be more iconic and traditional if it weren't for the fact that this is the version of Mickey it uses:
1624138476911.png
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom