The Empress Lilly
Well-Known Member
But how do we know that? It is the least likely explanation, based on the least likely premises.He was censored. Disney/Iger/Bay had the China article pulled. That is censorship, period.
Whether or not he could place his article somewhere else is irrelevant.
What is relevant is that Disney doesn't want it read. So they pulled it, using Iger's wife's pull at the post to do so.
Why would Disney jeopardise the name and career of its ceo and his wife, or why would Ms. Bay herself jeopardise her career, over a fluff non-piece that differs in no way, shape and form from a million other articles saying the exact same thing, and that can be read everywhere even when pulled anyway?
There is a reason no serious reporter is running this 'story': because there is none.
If a billionaire competitor is really unduly censored, if Disney's direct competitors in China CBS/Viacom are really unduly censored, then why aren't we seeing them scream murder about it?