ford91exploder
Resident Curmudgeon
No, no, no. Not Jar Jar. They can't be that dumb can they?
Yes, Yes they can.
No, no, no. Not Jar Jar. They can't be that dumb can they?
Sorry, I meant Shanghai. I guess it could apply to both though. Not saying they would, but if the Chinese govt just decided to shaft Disney, who or what would stop them?
One was wearing a copy of this JLo dress from a previous oscars.
![]()
Being nominated in the best song category allows some leeway in what you choose to wear apparently as they were allowed to attend.
Ye Cats - that one goes into the crimes against fashion category, That MIGHT be appropriate at the pool in Vegas but otherwise....
What if years down the road problems arise between Disney and China? Say China feels they have learned enough about the theme park business by working with Disney and they decide they no longer need them. Please understand this is extremely hypothetical and I was just thinking about it in the aspect of how China has no problems with their companies violating copyright laws on major companies such as Apple or infringing upon designs of automobiles from Honda to Rolls Royce. If huge corporations such as these cant win a lawsuit in a Chinese court, how would Disney? Again, Im just posturing an idea of "what if", and just asking out of curiosity and my lack of knowledge on how the deal between Disney and China was brokered.What is gained by giving Disney the boot? Shanghai has been entertaining the idea of a park for 20 years now. Disney isn't producing anything in Shanghai that can independently be sold like with a manufacturing facility and its associated skills. The Central Government has also ramped up IP enforcement in recent years.
It better beI think it was a joke.
China could expropriate the whole thing (a la Venezuela) then fight against the WTO. This would have serious implications in further foreign direct investment. However, does the size of the potential market outweigh the risk? Cisco may have an answer to that.What if years down the road problems arise between Disney and China? Say China feels they have learned enough about the theme park business by working with Disney and they decide they no longer need them. Please understand this is extremely hypothetical and I was just thinking about it in the aspect of how China has no problems with their companies violating copyright laws on major companies such as Apple or infringing upon designs of automobiles from Honda to Rolls Royce. If huge corporations such as these cant win a lawsuit in a Chinese court, how would Disney? Again, Im just posturing an idea of "what if", and just asking out of curiosity and my lack of knowledge on how the deal between Disney and China was brokered.
That's the risk with being in China. The market is so large and so lucrative they are willing to take the risk. It's not much different than any other American corporation in China like Starbucks and their 1,500+ stores.What if years down the road problems arise between Disney and China? Say China feels they have learned enough about the theme park business by working with Disney and they decide they no longer need them. Please understand this is extremely hypothetical and I was just thinking about it in the aspect of how China has no problems with their companies violating copyright laws on major companies such as Apple or infringing upon designs of automobiles from Honda to Rolls Royce. If huge corporations such as these cant win a lawsuit in a Chinese court, how would Disney? Again, Im just posturing an idea of "what if", and just asking out of curiosity and my lack of knowledge on how the deal between Disney and China was brokered.
I'll allow it.
hu, didnt Cisco get completely shaffed by that Chinese Clone company using both Cisco and 3Com tech?China could expropriate the whole thing (a la Venezuela) then fight against the WTO. This would have serious implications in further foreign direct investment. However, does the size of the potential market outweigh the risk? Cisco may have an answer to that.
If Shanghai wanted a theme park they could have built a theme park. They didn't need two decades to get that goal accomplished. They also could have offered enough cash to poach plenty of people from Walt Disney Imagineering. Disney has a degree of control in design and construction that is unusual.What's gained is Shendi gets ALL the money from the park not just some of it and since the IP in china is owned by the 'partnership' Shendi gets control of that as well.
Disney doesn't really have any operational secrets acquired by partnering with them. It'd just be a bunch of bad press. IP enforcement is an issue that directly impacts business, and it is now impacting local companies as well. Shanghai wants to be a global center, they're not going to blow that by screwing over one of world's largest entertainment companies. Moves in China are calculated, not done on a whim because they can be done.What if years down the road problems arise between Disney and China? Say China feels they have learned enough about the theme park business by working with Disney and they decide they no longer need them. Please understand this is extremely hypothetical and I was just thinking about it in the aspect of how China has no problems with their companies violating copyright laws on major companies such as Apple or infringing upon designs of automobiles from Honda to Rolls Royce. If huge corporations such as these cant win a lawsuit in a Chinese court, how would Disney? Again, Im just posturing an idea of "what if", and just asking out of curiosity and my lack of knowledge on how the deal between Disney and China was brokered.
What if years down the road problems arise between Disney and China? Say China feels they have learned enough about the theme park business by working with Disney and they decide they no longer need them. Please understand this is extremely hypothetical and I was just thinking about it in the aspect of how China has no problems with their companies violating copyright laws on major companies such as Apple or infringing upon designs of automobiles from Honda to Rolls Royce. If huge corporations such as these cant win a lawsuit in a Chinese court, how would Disney? Again, Im just posturing an idea of "what if", and just asking out of curiosity and my lack of knowledge on how the deal between Disney and China was brokered.
hu, didnt Cisco get completely shaffed by that Chinese Clone company using both Cisco and 3Com tech?
I remember even the US banned the tech in fears of "infiltration software embeeded in the chips".
China could expropriate the whole thing (a la Venezuela) then fight against the WTO. This would have serious implications in further foreign direct investment. However, does the size of the potential market outweigh the risk? Cisco may have an answer to that.
If Shanghai wanted a theme park they could have built a theme park. They didn't need two decades to get that goal accomplished. They also could have offered enough cash to poach plenty of people from Walt Disney Imagineering. Disney has a degree of control in design and construction that is unusual.
So much of the discussion has also been about how the properties are unknown. And you're repatedly ignoring the massive efforts that have been made to normalize IP enforcement on the Mainland.
Disney doesn't really have any operational secrets acquired by partnering with them. It'd just be a bunch of bad press. IP enforcement is an issue that directly impacts business, and it is now impacting local companies as well. Shanghai wants to be a global center, they're not going to blow that by screwing over one of world's largest entertainment companies. Moves in China are calculated, not done on a whim because they can be done.
The technology list you reference has to do with actual government work, not all state owned companies. The U.S. invokes similar "Buy American" clauses into government projects.Precisely, China does these 'Joint Ventures' as a means of transferring knowledge to China, China is kind of the 'Honey Badger' of nations, They do what benefits CHINA, The rest of the world be da-mmned.
Right now China has set a plan to eliminate all western technology companies products from Chinese funded ventures, So long Cisco say Hi to Huawei. So all the technology transfer that Cisco did benefits only China and Cisco is effectively being shown the door.
The USG bugging the gear did not help but it speeded up the process of removing western companies from the chinese technology market.
That still makes no sense. There is nothing overly unique about Disney operations. The amount Disney pays in is a pittance compared to what a Shanghai will pay, and Disney not being a cost effective enterprise has been well discussed. Everything could have been gained more quickly, for less money without Disney.True, However Shendi now has a park being built by the leading operator of theme parks in the western world plus the direct cash investment they would not have had that if they had gone solo. It will be interesting to see what develops over time.
A previous attempt to build a Castle park in china went bad.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...22-china-fake-disneyland-disney-world-travel/
Although some attempts at copying Disney worked quite well, and some might say surpassed them. Does Disney have Voltron and Ninja Turtles in it's 'It's A Small World'? Why no, no it doesn't.
Funny that I can't seem to find ANYTHING wrong with this choice..One was wearing a copy of this JLo dress from a previous oscars.
![]()
Being nominated in the best song category allows some leeway in what you choose to wear apparently as they were allowed to attend.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.