So Disney focusing on stock prices, like every other major corporation of the world, is the issue. It's the "Disney should be different" thing. I get it. I do. And it's mostly around us being theme park fans and wanting them to spend more money on the parks when it looks like on paper that the resort is doing pretty fantastic without major investments. I too think that the new standard in O-town is not the E-ticket, but the U-ticket - and why Universal is making such gains and that it's short-sighted.
But I also think that most of the same folks would be complaining that Disney's stock were lagging if it weren't doing so well, using that are direct evidence that Darth Iger was doing a poor job (as they should, because he would be). The biggest "thing" we have on him is that he hasn't spent lavishly on the parks, but I don't think a single other CEO would have done any different (and if they did, the current corporate climate would not have kept him in the job).
By all financial measures, he's doing a fantastic job for the company. That's not because I "like" him (does anyone actually "like" Bob Iger? He has no personality, there isn't much to like or dislike, IMO), but because all indicators are that he has saved the feature film business of the company. There is such a parallel to politics it's unbelievable - those out of office get romanticized to such a point that it's difficult to believe anyone says what they do with a straight face, and whomever is in office, no matter what messes they are left clean up (and make no mistake, Disney's film business was a massive mess in 2005), are the devil incarnate because they don't have our same personal pet causes.
But I get it. I think it's just as crappy we don't have new stuff to talk about at WDW, I think it's crappy how stale the parks have become - but I just can't focus that all on one person who by most measures available is doing very well otherwise and try to pretend they are doing a horrible job overall because I don't like the way they run one thing.