So instead of leaning towards Star Wars (which most other folks have agreed would be a good direction to go), you're going to say instead we should just mash Epcot and Tomorrowland again, got it.
I don't mean to come across as rude, but your post was incredibly condescending, especially where you're in the minority. Trust me, I was the one who championed Adventure Atoll, you don't want to start forcing your ideas on people who aren't responding to them.
IF we go with your idea, I can only see so many places we can take it which really won't lead to creative issues in the coming rounds. Remember, this is the theme for the WHOLE park we're deciding right now, we want to make sure we have options going forward.
A futuristic city/base/ship would make an excellent LAND, and I'm with you on that, but it wouldn't be a great basis for the PARK as a whole. We could easily incorporate that into a Star Wars park later down the line, as well as Outbound's space western ideas, and anything else we come up with.
I don't want to be the bad guy here, but that post required a response. Outbound, Nigel, and I have all responded well to Star Wars, so I'd like to hear
@DashHaber and
@AceAstro thoughts as well. I get your concerns and critiques, but I have my own of yours.
Let's see how the rest of the team responds rather than having a ****ing match between you and I on our ideas we don't even know two peoples' thoughts on. No point of arguing our two ideas if everyone else wants something else.
Also, for the record, I've seen Horizons, so I definitely didn't appreciate that condescending tone. That or the last line.