“Something major” coming to DHS???

TheIceBaron

Well-Known Member
I feel like whatever major expansion they add to DHS will be geared more to kids. I still think there isn’t enough for young ones to do at that park. So I don’t think they would put villains there.

Hate to say it but I could easily see them cloning the World of Frozen and just dump it where animation courtyard is and call it a day. I think the IP princesses print so much money that they think there should be a major princess (or equivalent like Encanto) presence in almost every park.

I think that’s the direction they are going for DHS but I will forgive them if they just give me a Star Wars dinner show with an animatronic Jabba the Hut.
 

Club Cooloholic

Well-Known Member
Dr. Facilier... conspicuously missing from TBA... would be prime to lead a "new" Villians land... couple him with Yzma/Kronk, Bowler Hat Guy, and Mother Gothel and I think you could have a solid group! (Though personally. I feel it would still be lacking without Malificent)
Maleficent used to be found doing random meet and greets at HS, sometimes near the old streets of New York, often around the Tower of Terror. Does she still appear anywhere there?
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
Hate to say it but I could easily see them cloning the World of Frozen and just dump it where animation courtyard is and call it a day.
What would that mean for Frozen Ever After?

Actually, y'know what, they'd probably just keep it. I wouldn't put it past 'em to have two Frozen attractions in two different parks (heck, they already do).
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Universal's more or less building it right now. Hope it turns out good and we get the rumored boat ride some day.
If it doesn’t go well, I hope they can still return those monsters costumes to Spirit Halloween. There’s a new location located conveniently down the street.
1716040431137.jpeg
 

mysto

Well-Known Member
The "Villain Land" concept has been armchair-imagineered for so long, it's grown to a Beastley Kingdomme-like mythos. Lovely material for a coffee table book, but impossible to meet expectations as a real place.

If an Imagineer were to take this on there's a chance they would get NO credit for it. Half the internet would proclaim "that's my idea". That's no way for an ambitious Imagineer to put their stamp on a major project.

This may contribute more to the unattractiveness of this project than we realize.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
What would that mean for Frozen Ever After?

Actually, y'know what, they'd probably just keep it. I wouldn't put it past 'em to have two Frozen attractions in two different parks (heck, they already do).

I think they'd have to retheme Frozen Ever After because it and Frozen Journey are too similar -- they even have the exact same scene. Frozen Journey is obviously better, so FEA would stop being any kind of draw for EPCOT.

But I don't think they're going to put World of Frozen into DHS.

EDIT: Actually I guess World of Frozen would mean the upgraded version of Frozen Ever After rather than Frozen Journey, so even moreso that they'd have to get rid of EPCOT FEA.
 

DisneyDean97

Well-Known Member
AFAIK the working concept was a sort of anti-Fantasyland (in the style of "new" Fantasyland / Fantasyland Forest)... a dark, skewed village outpost where different characters had set up shop, with at least one castle looming in the distance.
This sounds like a perfect idea, and probably the only way a villain land would work.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
A misinterpretation of Maelstom's history and my post.

Wanting the pavilion to be about Norway again is not the same as saying I want the exact same ride/movie from 1988.
I liked Maelstrom better too, but it’s just not happening. The ride will not be Norway-focused unless some seismic changes occur. I am also unsure how it’s a misrepresentation of its history; I remember walking on it over and over and over again even in the 90s.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It's big, and the number is safe. They haven't pulled back funding.

Somewhere, a group of execs are pacing around a conference room table... dropping beans on project printouts.

There are only so many beans.
It’s just a marker number…trust it at your peril

If the low WDIs are full in on that being a guarantee…they’re setting themselves to look stupid as usual
wasn't the final number closer to 17B for WDW....to be split up between 4 parks and resorts.... and not necessarily attractions..... So honestly we could be looking at a very small number for actual attraction expansion and development.....
It’s also not guaranteed to go to anything people crave…could be mostly just update and infrastructure stuff
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I liked Maelstrom better too, but it’s just not happening. The ride will not be Norway-focused unless some seismic changes occur. I am also unsure how it’s a misrepresentation of its history; I remember walking on it over and over and over again even in the 90s.
Because there were slow days then when the parks were built for growth

Hasn’t been that way for awhile
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom