Search results

Bad guest behaviour is a big deal breaker for me. And rude staff who think it's okay to talk down to someone because they're younger or they don't deem them as "equal". Other than that, there isn't really anything that says Disney World has gone "downhill". The parks are quieter at the moment...

Even if a female did it, I would still find it weird. I know people who won't even post photos of their kids online because they're terrified of who can get their hands on them.

I questioned him about his sources once. It did not end well. I ended up with about 50 people tweeting me defending the Dark Lords name.

We booked through a separate agent and still received magic mail which included a little blue book, resort information, our resort reservation info and a voucher to collect a gift card :) I'm in the UK and presuming this was sent from our TA on behalf of Disney, but I'm not 100% sure.

Never said it was clothing shaming, I said that people are free to do what they want without being sexualised, put down or have an entire forum post dedicated about it - there's bigger things going on in the world. Also yes, all lighthearted until someone insinuated that a young child under the...

I don't have kids, but if I did, I'd agree with this point. It is creepy to take photos of someone else's kids. If you're not friends or family, it's weird. If you're that desperate to get a photo of mickey, wait your turn in the queue and ask to have one of just him before you leave.

After our Nov trip, we aren't planning on going back until 2020.

I live in the UK and it's very hard to arrange a holiday to DL from here. Unlike WDW, there's no package deals or anything readily available (at least from what I've seen). It's also quite a bit more, and with the travel time, I would want to go for a couple weeks, but I know DL is more like a 5...

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

You do you, boo. If the best thing you can do is insult my intelligence then :facepalm: I don't need to be a scientist to know that people are entitled to wear what they want without being judged, oversexualised or ridiculed.

People can walk around in their underwear and still respect themselves, your attire doesn't determine that. I personally wouldn't do that and I don't think Disney would allow that.. But from what I've seen, people are literally complaining because you could see a part of someone's bum cheek...

It's the human body. It is what it is.

Please tell me how that is making a determination about other people? There is literally no need to be offended by the human body. At all. That's not determining anyone's opinion. There is nothing to offend anyone, everyone has seen a butt before. Just like there is no need to oversexualise, either.

Because there is absolutely no need to be offended by it? It's the human body. How people dress and what people do with their OWN personal appearance is nothing to do with anyone else. I could walk around in a thick winter coat when its 40* out and it still wouldn't be anyone elses business.

That's the difference though, you're not bothered by it, nor should anyone be.

Why is it any different? They're both hot environments where people are entitled to dress to feel comfy. Booty shorts and a crop top really is not that offensive unless you're trying to make it so. It's the norm here in the UK, girls can wear what they want in the summer and most of the time not...

It's only inappropriate because people can't look at the female form without oversexualising it. What's the difference between wearing booty shorts with a crop top & a 2 piece bikini where there is no choice for someones butt to be half hanging out?

This is probably the only thing I don't like about the FP system. What's the point in giving people parkhopper tickets but only allowing them to book FPs for one park?

I think the system is fair. If all FP's were open to everyone (for example, you could book SDD and RNRC on the same day) it would be unfair to the people who end up missing out. FP's for resort guests open at 60 days, offsite guests open at 30 days. It's to make sure that everyone gets an...

We don't study "social science" here in the UK. Bobs are not meant to be sexualised. They are made to feed babies. It is society that has taught us to sexualise bobs. * I am using bobs since it censors the actual word*