GoofGoof
Premium Member
This makes sense up to a point and I agree that you have to look at the macro level or big picture and not focus on individuals, but once enough of the general population is vaccinated you don’t really need proof of vaccination anymore. There has to be a tipping point when we start rolling back restrictions. I don’t know exactly when that will be, but at some point it has to happen. We can’t keep all the restrictions in place indefinitely or until cases go to zero. There has to be a happy medium.And so is the top level Leadership, and therefore the role of health institutions like the CDC, NIH, CIDRAP and everyone else who have had their advice ignored thus far.
I know what you are saying about you/individual/safety. I agree that a mask on a vaccinated person does not increase safety on a MICRO one-on-one level. But the reason the policy will be extended won't be for THAT reason, but the MACRO factors that increase safety for the remaining people who aren't vaccinated. So no, I am not stuck in March, but understand that ensuring safety between specific individuals with known vaccination status (if you can believe them. Remember, Dr. House's number one rule: People lie), is different than ensuring group safety when everyone's status is unknown or costly to acquire (in time and labor) to the entity responsible for ensuring safety for all.
Last edited: