oceanbreeze77
Well-Known Member
this denial of people showing a lack of empathy is a good example.Who is showing lack of empathy, show me one example.
this denial of people showing a lack of empathy is a good example.Who is showing lack of empathy, show me one example.
it definitely depends on your region of living
Per their testimony to Congress the other day, Astra-Zeneca may have their vaccine ready to go by late-autumn, early winter. But quantities will initially be extremely limited.My dad (who I realize is no expert) said it will affect all regions. He says a vaccine is way off, folks won't even want to uniformly BE vaccinated, and those companies still hanging on right now will have to pay the piper at some point. He says we'll look at 2020 as the good old days.
whoop there it is..It will be interesting to see to also look at the actual date of deaths in the 173 reported. I expected it to go up and might a bit more this week.
Per their testimony to Congress the other day, Astra-Zeneca may have their vaccine ready to go by late-autumn, early winter. But quantities will initially be extremely limited.
The other three companies reported that if all goes well (a big "if"), their products could be approved and available by mid-2021.
There is what, just want to look at the facts, deaths that happen back weeks, month or more ago does not tell us much what is happening now and should not be a basis on decision making regarding closures.whoop there it is..
Its why many are saying more should be done to slow the spread. Maybe you have to start fining people for not following social distancing. Here it's almost $900 for not complying. People are listening. Masks are mandatory now. Its working here now that almost everything is open minus theme parks, movie theaters and casinos.It will be interesting to see to also look at the actual date of deaths in the 173 reported. I expected it to go up and might a bit more this week.
whoop there it is..
It's comical, and sad, to see the same person post "US had the lowest total of deaths for the day" a few weeks ago and then now "well, let's wait and look at when the deaths occured".............
Stop engaging. Know that it's now a minority opinion - however loud and insistent.
It's gotten to a real comedic point now, though.
Kind of like our favorite "movie insider" lol
I honestly think it's they are trying to convince people that things aren't that bad that we should shutdown again. No one is saying that instead maybe do something like make masks mandatory. Thoughts and prayers do nothing.It's comical, and sad, to see the same person post "US had the lowest total of deaths for the day" a few weeks ago and then now "well, let's wait and look at when the deaths occured".............
In my opinion it is more the fact of where you are geographically, look at where all the outbreaks are now, the very southern part of the USIts why many are saying more should be done to slow the spread. Maybe you have to start fining people for not following social distancing. Here it's almost $900 for not complying. People are listening. Masks are mandatory now. Its working here now that almost everything is open minus theme parks, movie theaters and casinos.
I honestly think it's they are trying to convince people that things aren't that bad that we should shutdown again. No one is saying that instead maybe do something like make masks mandatory. Thoughts and prayers do nothing.
I don't care where it's happening cause the measures that most places have put in place works. Where a mask, practice physical distancing, wash hands and STAY HOME IF YOU ARE SICK. For some reason the southern part of the US has not interest in that. Start fining people who don't follow those rules.In my opinion it is more the fact of where you are geographically, look at where all the outbreaks are now, the very southern part of the US
Still doesn't mean nothing should be done. IMO if you feel safer at theme parks then why can't they make all businesses follow the same rules.
You're missing the point of a lockdown. It's not solely a question of whether virus is spreading inside the doors of the business. It's about whether the virus is spreading in the Uber on the way to the business. It's about whether people are congregating outside the business. It's about whether employees have to take mass transit or carpool to get to work at the business, during which time virus spreads.
And yes, the hard lock downs do smash the virus. "Several hundred cases per day" in places with populations in the tens of millions -- that is indeed smashed. France, for example, when from over 4,000 cases per day... Over the last 2 months, down to 400-600 cases per day. The population of France is 3 times the population of Florida -- So that would be the equivalent of Florida having only 100-200 cases per day, as opposed to 10,000 per day. Yes, I'd say 95-99% fewer daily cases is smashed.
Yes, let's use Spain as an example. Perfect.
Population of Spain -- 47 million.
Population of Florida -- 21.5 million.
Spain case peak: About 7,800 Florida peak-- unknown at this time, but maybe about 11,000
Spain 7 day average through June -- About 350 cases.
Now in July, a couple months after the end of the lockdown, cases are starting to rise again -- They are back up to about 1400.
Current in Florida -- 11,000 on average.
So... population of 47 million -- 2-3 months after end of a hard lock down, only 1400 cases.
Florida, population of 21 million, 2-3 months after end of a very soft lock down, 11,000 cases.
So Florida has about 20x more daily cases on a population-adjusted basis.
You're missing the whole point --- So you're saying, there is no difference between 500 cases and 10,000 cases. No difference between 300,000 deaths and 3,000 deaths??
As you just said -- Lockdowns suppress spikes --- So if you suppress the spikes and keep them low enough, while you develop improved treatments and vaccines -- you save lives!!!!! Hundreds of thousands of lives!!!
You're saying that since a lockdown would only save 90% of the potential lost lives, since 10% of the deaths may still occur... we might as well just give up and let everyone die??
There you go again. Since it's not practical to eliminate 100% of the virus, we shouldn't even bother taking steps that can eliminate 90% of it????
The order of priority for distribution will probably be 1) First responders, front-line health care workers and military 2) Other health care workers 3) Vulnerable populations 4) Everyone else.Well, we've heard of promises from pharma, haven't we? I hope this is true but also, I hope a) people don't make it yet another ridiculous political talking point because they don't want it (let's just move them to a new COVID state somewhere), and b) the government finds a way to distribute it. It's really a situation where the wealthy won't be any safer if the plebs don't have access, too.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.