Heppenheimer
Well-Known Member
By the way, if anyone ever wants to review the evidence for or against a given medical question, Google is not your best source. Google's algorithms are trying to find the best match for you based on past searches... hence, it already knows your biases and it is more likely to give you results that match with your previous searches, not the most relevant, scientifically validated answers. Google is trying to steer you towards relevant advertisers, not properly vetted scientific consensus.
The single best source is Up to Date, but this is behind a rather expensive pay-wall.
Second best is Medscape, which is free, although you need to create an account and some of the information here is sometimes not as well vetted as on Up to Date.
Third, if you actually want to see the raw studies, go to Pubmed. This will give you at least an abstract to any study published throughout most of the world. However, just because a paper was published does not automatically mean that its findings were generally accepted as valid by the wider medical and scientific community. And to be blunt... most lay people have neither the specialized education nor the training to properly analyze and contextualize research papers.
The CDC is also a good source, both for professional and lay people, but they tend to concentrate more on infectious diseases than general health.
The single best source is Up to Date, but this is behind a rather expensive pay-wall.
Second best is Medscape, which is free, although you need to create an account and some of the information here is sometimes not as well vetted as on Up to Date.
Third, if you actually want to see the raw studies, go to Pubmed. This will give you at least an abstract to any study published throughout most of the world. However, just because a paper was published does not automatically mean that its findings were generally accepted as valid by the wider medical and scientific community. And to be blunt... most lay people have neither the specialized education nor the training to properly analyze and contextualize research papers.
The CDC is also a good source, both for professional and lay people, but they tend to concentrate more on infectious diseases than general health.