Epcot82Guy
Well-Known Member
Depending on how nitpicky you want to get, Soarin' does have Tinkerbell... it's my daughter's favorite part
That's actually a great point. I don't per se like it. But, I also realize that's probably taking what I want too far. It's where balance comes in for the very reason you highlight. Epcot is Disney World, and Tink is a cute nod to where you are. I even think you can go more blatant with it and still have it work and make sense. Like Remy being the host for Food and Wine. Or having an attraction about France that is hosted by Remy.
My point is where the overarching story has to be shoehorned or make less sense to justify adding something. Rather than working to make something creative that satisfies both.
If you look in the fan art (Disney and many other "geeky" things), you see some incredibly creative stories where they have mashed up totally different things very successfully. Disney itself has done it incredibly well with lands like Pandora - where many didn't see how they could. They also have gone the cheap and easy route like Frozen and Norway.
My point being, while many purists still exist, I think most of us in that camp realize the need for Epcot's audience to grow. We just wish it could be done with that level of taste and creativity vs. something that feels forced.