• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DHS Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

jenjen9ny

New Member
This is actually my preference. We can still retheme Meleose to HarryHausen’s if we have to, since it is between lands now.

Heck, I’d even be okay with replacing Stage One with a Flat Ride. Just don’t touch MuppetVision
Let’s leave Mama Melrose alone and retheme Pizza Rizzo to be HarryHausens. No reason why the restaurant can’t be a quick service Japanese place like they have in EPCOT.
 

GravityFalls

Active Member
The problem with that is it's a very small pathway for what will be undoubtedly be a popular land and will create another dead end.
This is a good point, best I can think of is having guests exit through the Christmas shop, they'd have to build a back entrance.

1724455403843.png
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
Plans in EU have been regularly shifting. Nix a theater for a family coaster. Hold off on a second Potter ride. Move around restaurants.

Full steam ahead means a few of the box cars fall off.
At least Uni can make decisions quickly. Disney seems to take the design by committee approach which takes 19373626616363 years to complete and produces a mediocre result which lacks the creative vision to please anyone while simultaneously offending everyone.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
At least Uni can make decisions quickly. Disney seems to take the design by committee approach which takes 19373626616363 years to complete and produces a mediocre result which lacks the creative vision to please anyone while simultaneously offending everyone.
They just announce everything earlier, which makes it look less stable when it’s probably the same amount of stable. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
Wrong on first as another mentioned, imaginary speculation on the second 🙃

Even if it were the case they can't decide, that's better than blind decisions. What exactly would be wrong with Disney taking more time to evaluate options?
Is Uni not going full steam ahead? Have you not seen the aerials?

There’s obviously conflicting concept art. They claim that this is a green-lit project, so why no details?

Their decision making process is defective. It takes too long and arrives at compromises that please nobody.
 

Orange is the new Red

Well-Known Member
At least Uni can make decisions quickly. Disney seems to take the design by committee approach which takes 19373626616363 years to complete and produces a mediocre result which lacks the creative vision to please anyone while simultaneously offending everyon
They announce so early out of desperation. They have so little that they actually build and when they do build something, it’s never a home run anymore. They’ve lost their

They announce so early out of desperation. They have so little that they actually build and when they do build something, it’s never a home run anymore. They’ve lost their touch.


I think most of their new attractions in the past are awesome. Starwars, pandora, guardians, Tron. They are awesome! No?
I’ll give you Tiana, but I think at least one of the people responsible for Tiana and the Epcot debacle are no longer in the company.

Anyway just got back from Dis and Universal. I’ll say this, Universal isn’t exactly making proper investments in their current parks. I mean some of their rides were in a Six Flags type of condition, especially that flume ride. That thing is gross. You think DreamWorld land and that other recent stand up shooter thing are good additions???
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
I think most of their new attractions in the past are awesome. Starwars, pandora, guardians, Tron. They are awesome! No?
I’ll give you Tiana, but I think at least one of the people responsible for Tiana and the Epcot debacle have been let go.

Anyway just got back from Dis and Universal. I’ll say this, Universal isn’t exactly making proper investments in their current parks. I mean some of their rides were in a Six Flags type of condition, especially that flume ride. That thing is gross. You think DreamWorld land and that other recent stand up shooter thing are good additions???
Each attraction you mentioned is good, but not a home run. Not trying to nitpick, but each one has its own quirk that snaps defeat from the jaws of victory. Whether it’s that the ride is too short or that it replaced something beloved. They just can’t seem to expand their parks in creative ways like they used to. Everest was their last expansion that checked every box as awesome. Since then, each new ride has had some kind of drawback it can’t atone for.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Starship824

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Each attraction you mentioned is good, but not a home run. Not trying to nitpick, but each one has its own quirk that snaps defeat from the jaws of victory. Whether it’s that the ride is too short or that it replaced something beloved. They just can’t seem to expand their parks in creative ways like they used to. Everest was their last expansion that checked every box as awesome. Since then, each new ride has had some kind of drawback it can’t atone for.
For me Pandora was the last great thing with basically no downsides.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom