• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DHS Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
What confuses me is, what good reason is there to go with removing Muppets over the empty, abandoned old animation studio? There's WAY more space over from Launch Bay back to have the coaster, a restaurant, shops, and even some smaller attractions. Muppets has way less space to work with, and removes attractions instead of being an expansion. DHS needs expansions, not replacements.
 

ctrlaltdel

Well-Known Member
Screenshot 2024-08-14 093038.png


The biggest knock against Muppets is that there is no way it won't impact the service road, and a coaster building could be visible from Galaxy's Edge.

In the attached picture , even if we are thinking it is a small coaster building (this is approx. the size of the main building for the post-launch section of RnR, it does not include the queue or launch sections), that still would mean going onto the service road, using the old Studio store as the queue building. It would still necessitate demolition of the backside of Muppet's Courtyard, which makes sense from the concept art, likely utilizing a rethemed Grand ave. as Monstropolis as well.

I am assuming it would be at around 80 ft tall, if not higher. In all likelihood, the main building would be nearly twice the size going off the model.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
What confuses me is, what good reason is there to go with removing Muppets over the empty, abandoned old animation studio? There's WAY more space over from Launch Bay back to have the coaster, a restaurant, shops, and even some smaller attractions. Muppets has way less space to work with, and removes attractions instead of being an expansion. DHS needs expansions, not replacements.
Muppet Courtyard is big enough to fit it while the area behind Launch Bay can hold more so why waste it on a small land?

Also, Mitch in Marketing works behind Launch Bay and really doesn’t want to have to box up his printer and stapler. It’s a Swingline!
 

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
So…when do you think they tell us? We can speculate about it all day but certainty would be nice. I also hope it’s not when they put shovels in the ground.
 

Streetway

Well-Known Member
View attachment 809236

The biggest knock against Muppets is that there is no way it won't impact the service road, and a coaster building could be visible from Galaxy's Edge.

In the attached picture , even if we are thinking it is a small coaster building (this is approx. the size of the main building for the post-launch section of RnR, it does not include the queue or launch sections), that still would mean going onto the service road, using the old Studio store as the queue building. It would still necessitate demolition of the backside of Muppet's Courtyard, which makes sense from the concept art, likely utilizing a rethemed Grand ave. as Monstropolis as well.

I am assuming it would be at around 80 ft tall, if not higher. In all likelihood, the main building would be nearly twice the size going off the model.
I didn’t think about that.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
Sure. perhaps I'm not being explicit enough, but yes I would make sure you have Monsters themed merch and eating in addition to any attractions. I just take that as a given.

My point was that if you remove Mama Melrose as well as the main store, you have access backstage space that can be added to the on stage park space. On that currently backstage + Mama Melrose space I would certainly put not only the Door Coaster but also new food and merch themed to Monsters).

I'm terrible with graphics, but....

View attachment 809231

Problem is all that space under construction in 2018 is now cast member parking. So you are taking a HUGE chunk of cast member parking out to reroute that road, plus have their road they drive on to get to their parking.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Bye bye muppets and star tours.
No. It has been confirmed by the site that shall not be named, Muppets are not going anywhere and Monsters will be where the launch bay is now

And it has nothing to do with Tom C. being back on the media list and that Disney now has Tom back to lie for them 😉

Side note - Tom is totally OK with Rivers of America, Tom Sayers Island, Liberty Square Riverboat going away in MK, apparently that's OK, but he would be against Rivers of America and Mark Twain going away in DLR.

Funny how that is. Its pure coincidence I am sure.
 
Last edited:

EPCOTCenterLover

Well-Known Member
What dead space are you talking about? Indy to the fence at the park entrance is legit like 150 feet
I mean, cut into the parking lot to build it. That side of the park needs a big draw and this could be the answer. I guess it all goes to show what a poorly designed layout this park had. Little room for expansion and awkward paths for traveling from one attraction to another.
 

Horizons '83

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
But are they actually using a dead zone? If they aren't building heavily into the backstage area then doing anything in the Animation Courtyard area is a mistake. That's where the expansion room is for DHS and the park needs to add a ton of stuff to do.

Realistically, we need to see expansion that adds a net of 5-6 rides to DHS without losing anything. DHS is a slog to tour because of the limited offerings many of which command high wait times and because they are very few things you can do on a whim with small waits (MuppetVision being one of the only). The live shows all have schedules they aren't aren't necessarily convenient to pop into.
I certainly don't know their plans, but they would need to use that backstage area in order to make a sufficient land, so if AC is being considered, then that area would have to go in my mind.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Depending on how much USF attendance craters due to EU, it's entirely possible from speculation over on the IU forums that Pokemon could be fast tracked ahead of the 2030 debut. There have also been rumblings that Simpsons is closing earlier at USH before 2028.
Not to continue off-topic but they would be absolutely insane not to immediately fast track Pokemon at both USF and USH immediately after opening EU.
It might be a cash flow thing. Universal is both losing a ton of money (Peacock, movie flops, lower park attendance) and probably spending an astronomical amount on Epic. Perhaps Pokemon plans are beyond what they’ll have available.
Universal cannot just unilaterally decide to start building Pokémon attractions.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom