• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

EagleScout610

What a wisecracker
Premium Member

Untitled868_20240806150641.png
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Has WDI explained yet why everybody else (Charlotte, Naveen, Mama Odi, etc.) looks like they just walked right out of the animated movie and haven't aged a day while Tiana looks, well, um, "more mature"?
I think the cover story line was for the attraction was she is supposed to be older, BECAUSE they wanted to use EXISTING animatronics designs instead of creating new for a different face shape to save costs.

The same way they clone rides to save costs.

Just a guess.
 

Epcot81Fan

Well-Known Member
I think the cover story line was for the attraction was she is supposed to be older, BECAUSE they wanted to use EXISTING animatronics designs instead of creating new for a different face shape to save costs.

The same way they clone rides to save costs.

Just a guess.
If that is true, that is even more idiotic. You age up one character (the most important one) and then leave the others looking exactly like the movie?

For a ride that was deemed to be so “important”, it is honestly shocking how poorly they treated Tiana - both in her appearance (apparently we cannot show or discuss the comparison to the animated film character) and role in the attraction.
 
Last edited:

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
I have never did a VQ and I have a question.

When Tiana goes down, what happens to the folks that were boarding at that moment?

Can they return at any time to enter with whatever boarding group is boarding?
 

KDM31091

Well-Known Member
I’m hearing a lot of people saying that this is a disaster, with the ride breaking nearly daily and being a huge expense to fix. The downtime has been insane. I wonder what the future holds.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
At this point, if they can keep the attraction working without going down and someday open the standby, that's good enough for me because I said from day 1, it will still be a fun log flume ride no matter the theme.

I am a little disappointed that got rid of the water cannons at the end, but beggars cant be choosers.
 
Last edited:

Epcot81Fan

Well-Known Member
Even ignoring the outfits they put her in, the Tiana animatronics look incredibly off-model.
It was one of the more bizarre choices they made. One would think with the dynamics around this attraction they would have been even more focused on ensuring the animatronic was on-model. Having an "Eh, it's close enough" on this attraction is just shocking.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
It was one of the more bizarre choices they made. One would think with the dynamics around this attraction they would have been even more focused on ensuring the animatronic was on-model. Having an "Eh, it's close enough" on this attraction is just shocking.
Seems they havent been able to produce an AA that is representative of the source real life or animated since Mermaid? I think it started there but might have been earlier. 2017 was particularly bad with HoP
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Seems they havent been able to produce an AA that is representative of the source real life or animated since Mermaid? I think it started there but might have been earlier.
The Frozen and Tangled animatronics are pretty bang-on because they were already realized in 3D. The Golden Age and Renaissance characters have always been harder to translate because some of them are stylized in a way that doesn't translate well. Look at how off the characters in Wreck-It Ralph are that aren't Anna, Elsa, Rapunzel, Moana, or Merida. Also consider why they've waffled between giving certain characters real hair in some instances and solid molded lumps in others. It's not easy to do, particularly because you can't cel-shade things in real life.

By contrast, I actually think the Golden Age characters tend to be easiest to cast for M&Gs because they were often more faithfully rotoscoped from real-life models, including facial proportions. Meanwhile, big-headed round-eyed characters will require some compromise.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
The Frozen and Tangled animatronics are pretty bang-on because they were already realized in 3D. The Golden Age and Renaissance characters have always been harder to translate because some of them are stylized in a way that doesn't translate well. Look at how off the characters in Wreck-It Ralph are that aren't Anna, Elsa, Rapunzel, Moana, or Merida. Also consider why they've waffled between giving certain characters real hair in some instances and solid molded lumps in others. It's not easy to do, particularly because you can't cel-shade things in real life.

By contrast, I actually think the Golden Age characters tend to be easiest to cast for M&Gs because they were often more faithfully rotoscoped from real-life models, including facial proportions. Meanwhile, big-headed round-eyed characters will require some compromise.
I thought the projected faces were one of the prime examples of the loss of talent, just a lazy way to deliver a wow moment like so many of the rides they have built. One trick pony if you will but really lacking on the 1000th viewing unlike some of the classics. They will never make a 100% realistic AA despite what Bob is teasing but they have interpreted the source material successfully in the past to look good every time even if not as complex. Often less is more but when your reputation is forming you tend to pick the easy way if you can. The people that had years of perspective to know what is pleasing to the eye and sensibilities are sadly missing today
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
The projected faces don't make them off-model, though. I also think they were more an experiment with new technology than a result of laziness. They've obviously moved away from them now because they think the effect is ultimately less satisfying and the intended maintenance reduction not as substantial as they had hoped.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom