I guess this is.…….never mind!
Elemental Review - IGN
Visually, Pixar is in absolutely top form with Elemental. Unfortunately, the story is way too thin and none of it makes any sense.www.ign.com
Even Disney shill sites don’t like it.
Uh-Oh!!
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Elemental (Pixar - June 2023)
- Thread starter DCBaker
- Start date
erasure fan1
Well-Known Member
When the film division doesn't make money, you can bet your bottom dollar that it impacts the parks.
BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
I think calling it toxic fan culture may be a little extreme. Toxic fan culture is harassing actors/actresses because you didn't like the movie they were in. Not hoping Disney takes its lumps because they're anti-consumer. I don't really think that's toxic.... irrational maybe, abut not 'toxic.'
If you have negative feelings towards Disney, chances are you want Disney to do poorly financially as recompense for conducting their business in a way you don't like. So I don't find it strange that 'fans' are rooting against the company.
A lot of people have been huge Disney fans their entire lives. When the company you've supported for that long starts to openly disrespect its fans, disregard them, decrease the quality of their products and conduct business in a way that negatively affects its customers, it should be unsurprising that people get a little ticked off and start to just wish ill on Disney as a whole.
Last edited:
BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
that's true, but Disney has also made at least me feel that parks investment is usually a bad thing. So, if Disney declines to invest in their parks, at least we aren't losing anything. They will likely let attractions degrade more, but as they have proven, they'll do that anyway.
erasure fan1
Well-Known Member
Using "toxic fandom" has become a catch all defense. If someone doesn't agree with something, all too often the toxic fandom defense comes charging out. Every fandom has toxic fans for sure, but they are very much the absolute minority in the big picture. It's just easier to label everyone who doesn't agree with your point of view, or has anything negative to say, a toxic fan.
Tha Realest
Well-Known Member
In the other thread toxic has been expanded to “people who haven’t seen the movie yet.”
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
I personally think there is something toxic about people deliberately going from thread to thread solely to celebrate the failure of films they have absolutely no interest in. I welcome discussion and a diversity of opinions, but relentless heckling is not the same as well-founded criticism.
erasure fan1
Well-Known Member
You can find that annoying, but that isn't what is meant by toxic fandom. I wouldn't go around calling the people who go from thread to thread saying how great everything is, even when it's a complete fail, toxic. It's just a completely overused term that has become a crutch defense.
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
But there is no such equivalent anyway. Even the most ardent Pixie Dusters among us acknowledge what we don’t like. Again, no-one is asking for positivity all around, just good-faith discussion.
erasure fan1
Well-Known Member
I agree, I just don't think what you're talking about should be classified as toxic.
Vegas Disney Fan
Well-Known Member
I think it’s been the same reason with all the films people are happy to see fail, ideology. Disney has been a moderate left company for decades but recently they have been far less subtle in their films.
Many people feel Disney is now making movies to make a political/social statement rather than entertain people, and for people that grew up loving Disney movies they just want to sit in a theater and be entertained by Disney without being preached to.
It’s the same reason people celebrate when something bad happens to Fox News, Disneys gotten caught up in the us vs them wars.
CaptainMickey
Well-Known Member
You must be a Maple Leafs fan with that much pain
With your analogy, Kathleen Kennedy is easily the worst GM ever.
Good faith discussion is the new buzz term for
“We can talk about things all you want as long as you share my point of view”.
People are still allowed to discuss FACTS.
Maybe Elementals or Mermaid made you feel good and someone posted something nice on Twitter. That’s all cute.
The facts are they both will lose money.
“We can talk about things all you want as long as you share my point of view”.
People are still allowed to discuss FACTS.
Maybe Elementals or Mermaid made you feel good and someone posted something nice on Twitter. That’s all cute.
The facts are they both will lose money.
Sir_Cliff
Well-Known Member
I think what you're describing, though, is along the lines of what is meant by the term "toxic fandom". One extreme variant of that is harassing actors and actresses or other creative professionals. But it also involves this kind of hostility not based on subjective judgements of the quality of, in this case, Disney films, but a sense that Disney as something you cared about is personally disrespecting you through the entertainment it is produces. This is then translated into an effort to wrest back control of what they are producing mainly through this kind of relentless negativity in the fan community.
To be clear, I am not saying you are toxic nor that everyone needs to be positive about anything they don't like. You and I have agreed on other threads about things we see as highly negative in the parks. In general, I am of the opinion that Disney has made visiting WDW too complicated and expensive for it to be worth it for the time being.
What we were talking about here, though, is thread after thread full of people gleefully rubbing their hands over the prospect of films failing they both haven't seen and don't have any interest in seeing as a way of sticking it to Disney. In this case, the reviews aren't even particularly bad and it is supposed to be the thing everyone wants: an original story. Without seeing it, though, people are declaring that it needs to fail because the story isn't good or original enough as what I think is a fig leaf for a more general desire to see Disney suffer.
Exactly. What is striking to me is not that people don't find certain films appealing. In my case, I never bothered seeing Lightyear or Strange World, for example, as neither really appealed. What is striking is that there seem to be a small group dedicated solely to predicting and cheering on the failure of film after film.
Last edited:
Chi84
Premium Member
In fairness, that was a request made by a mod early in the thread before the film was released apparently in response to non-stop posting by one person.
It doesn’t apply anymore, but limiting film critiques to those who have seen the film is not a novel idea. No one shows up at a book club explaining that they didn’t read the book because it didn’t sell too many copies and they hope the author writes something different next time.
I do appreciate the fact that box office is a measure of a film’s success and there has been a good deal of reasoned discussion on that issue. But simply noting over and over again that the film is not doing well doesn’t really add anything.
TalkingHead
Well-Known Member
So anyway, while this has pulled into the positive side on RT, if you scratch the surface you’ll notice a lot of the positive reviews are 2.5 stars. Metacritic gives a more accurate picture with their 58 score. The consensus seems to be it’s a flawed or underwhelming story. I thought Pixar prided themselves on spending whatever money it takes to work out story beats. Really makes me increasingly skeptical of Inside Out 2.
erasure fan1
Well-Known Member
That seemed to be a Lassiter thing. From the things I read, he wasn't afraid to retool a story to get it right if it wasn't working. Disney seems to be more of the, if it's not working, just try your best to reduce the damage.
So.. the site gives a Disney move a thumbs-down and you still call it a "shill site"?Elemental Review - IGN
Visually, Pixar is in absolutely top form with Elemental. Unfortunately, the story is way too thin and none of it makes any sense.
Even Disney shill sites don’t like it.
Uh-Oh!!
This is the very definition of toxic fandom.
And lack of good faith discussion.
Last edited:
BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
Well, I guess whether or not it's toxic depends on how you say things man. If you're being outwardly rude or hostile towards other posters, then 100% that's toxic, I agree. But if they're just saying they hope the film fails, in a way that isn't disrespecting any other human beings, then I wouldn't call that toxic, respectfully. You can hope the film succeeds, you can hope it fails, those are both just opinions. Where things get toxic is when you start inflicting harm on others based on those opinions. At least, that's how I see things.