Okay, four things here.
1) As somebody else pointed out, the argument for why
Zootopia doesn't fit in the park but
Moana does is contradictory:
Zootopia doesn't fit because "Animal Kingdom is about animals with animal problems, and the animals in
Zootopia act like humans." But
Moana DOES fit in Animal Kingdom despite being about humans as opposed to animals because "Animal Kingdom isn't about animals, it's about our connection to the environment and blah-blah-blah." Which is it?
2) You can keep pointing at the Te Fiti crap, but
Moana is first and foremost about a human character teaming up with another human (or at least half-human half-god) character to save her village full of humans and fulfill her dream of sailing. It's hardly about learning to live in harmony with animals. I wouldn't say that a land based on that
Flowers and Trees short would fit in Animal Kingdom even though it's technically about the environment.
WALL-E has an environmental message. So did
Cars 2. Do THEY fit in Animal Kingdom?
3)
AVATAR might not be a perfect fit either, but at least that movie has more of a focus on non-human characters (the Na'vi) than humans. And it actually takes place in a jungle-ish environment as opposed to
Moana's sandy beaches and oceans.
4) Everyone seems to have this idea that the hypothetical
Moana attractions at Animal Kingdom will follow the park's "protecting the environment and our relationship with it" nature. The chances of that are incredibly small. It's likely just going to be another Frozen Ever After / Tiana's Totally Woke Salt Mine Adventure and have Moana sailing around singing songs from the film. I'd be shocked if the Moana land even had any animal exhibits.
Do any of these things come to mind when you think of Animal Kingdom?
View attachment 666549
View attachment 666550
View attachment 666551