You can't put Moana in, even though the whole theme is the importance of environment, which is AK's theme. But... Zootopia fits cause it has animated animals?
I don't think
Zootopia fits either, but I can at least see how Disney thought of it (the mindset being "Hey, it's about animals!"). I'm pretty sure when people think of
Moana, they think of the human characters, not any of the "environmental" messages.
Again,
WALL-E has a "save the planet" moral and nobody's begging for THAT to be shoved into Animal Kingdom.
— The justifications for Zootopia and Moana are contradictory. Zootopia = “DAK is about animals, even if in an artificial setting/with human characteristics.” Moana = “DAK is really about nature, not just animals.”
Yes. This.
I just hope it's not a Moana miniland with some random animals thrown in.
That's what it's gonna be. There's very little chance of them having Moana teach the riders about sea turtles or whatever, it's just gonna be a
Moana ride with the human characters as the stars.
Of course they can't do any wholly original ideas, which is the worst part, but Disney has a giant IP catalog. The thing is, though, most of that catalog is unusable. The IP mandate doesn't mean use anything Disney owns, it means use anything Disney owns that's relatively recent or has demonstrated long-term market feasibility.
They're not going to build a ride where the Rescuers, Robin Hood, or Bedknobs and Broomsticks is the featured IP even if the attraction design is incredible.
This too. It seems like the only chance a pre-2010 movie made by Disney has of getting an attraction nowadays is if it stars a princess.
This doesn't automatically make the movie about animals.
Look at
Aladdin. It has a monkey, a tiger, a parrot, horses, camels (seventy-five golden ones!), purple peacocks, white Persian monkeys, elephants, llamas, bears, and lions in it. Does it belong in Animal Kingdom?
It'd be one thing if Animal Kingdom already had a Polynesian-themed land and they were just adding a
Moana attraction to it. But dedicating an entire land to a movie that focuses on humans because it has an environmental message is ridiculous. It'd be like adding a
Futurama land to Animal Kingdom because there are episodes of the show that focus on protecting the environment.
Would you spend $1B on a new ride, with an unknown character, and hope it was popular? No, you would select existing, popular characters, and see what kind of ride they could fit. That way you could instantly guarantee the ride was popular from the synergies between the existing IP and the new ride.
That's funny, seeing as most of the Disney Parks' biggest flops were based on IPs. Stitch's Great Escape? The Under New Management Tiki Room? PIXAR Pier?