SorcererMC
Well-Known Member
I will not cancel my trip, but I will smell like OFF the whole time.
. I think there are some better-smelling alternatives now.
I will not cancel my trip, but I will smell like OFF the whole time.
Not that really work.. I think there are some better-smelling alternatives now.
What we really need is to bring back DDT until the problem of zika is solved. If using DDT for decades didn't kill us all then limited use of it again for even a few months wouldn't be an issue.Re: aerial spraying, it has limited effectiveness against the particular mosquito vector for Zika, Aedes aegypti (also vector Aedes albopictus which has a greater range than Aedes aegypti). As there is no treatment or vaccine, mosquito control is the best preventive measure (and the politics of funding that is a real....mess).
The good news re: local transmission is that an infected mosquito only travels within a few hundred yards during its lifetime. The bad news is that Orlando and Miami are future hotspots for it, so FL tourism is likely to be affected regardless of what officials say. Orlando is also having an influx of Puerto Ricans fleeing the economic crisis there, and Zika is rampant in Puerto Rico....Zika is asymptomatic for 4 out of 5 individuals. It's definitely an evolving situation, and I'm really hoping that it doesn't reach 'Ebola hysteria' levels.
What we really need is to bring back DDT until the problem of zika is solved. If using DDT for decades didn't kill us all then limited use of it again for even a few months wouldn't be an issue.
'need'? Not in the least; Zika is not malaria. Bringing back DDT in the US would be misguided folly, for a number of reasons, including questionable efficacy.What we really need is to bring back DDT until the problem of zika is solved. If using DDT for decades didn't kill us all then limited use of it again for even a few months wouldn't be an issue.
'need'? Not in the least; Zika is not malaria. Bringing back DDT in the US would be misguided folly, for a number of reasons, including questionable efficacy.
What is your point? Are you trying to tell members here who have had to reluctantly cancel a trip to WDW that their obstetricians are wrong?I don't have a sensationalized article to post..
But here's another 2 maps.
1 of Wynwood. 1 of Miami. Just to try and give people an idea of how small the Wynwood area is. View attachment 154375View attachment 154376
What is your point? Are you trying to tell members here who have had to reluctantly cancel a trip to WDW that their obstetricians are wrong?
Her point is to get the last word - over and over. The ignore button is your friend.What is your point? Are you trying to tell members here who have had to reluctantly cancel a trip to WDW that their obstetricians are wrong?
Yes, because why insert logic into a panic fantasy? It's better to just let people spread untruths to frighten others.Her point is to get the last word - over and over. The ignore button is your friend.
Hopefully people take it! Including the media!Quote from the US Travel Assn on Nightly Business Report on the Impact to the Tourism Industry:
"We're in the early stages of this, and the facts, it's most important for us all to make sure we're listening to the experts, being precise with the information, and that there is proper perspective and keep a level-head (neither overreact or underreact)."
Good advice!
Is it not logical to assume that many of the South Americans visiting WDW are carriers of the Zika virus and can transmit said virus via local mosquitos to other WDW patrons? It is the doctors who are using this logic when advising their patients to stay away from WDW.Yes, because why insert logic into a panic fantasy? It's better to just let people spread untruths to frighten others.
My advise, start at page 1 and read this entire thread. I'm not being funny, actually serious, it might let you view the convo in a different light. Not one person has said for a pregnant woman to rush anywhere. As I said, warnings have been in place for pregnant women since this past winter. None of that is new info.Is it not logical to assume that many of the South Americans visiting WDW are carriers of the Zika virus and can transmit said virus via local mosquitos to other WDW patrons? It is the doctors who are using this logic when advising their patients to stay away from WDW.
Just reported on CNN that 33 US military members now infected with Zika. Oy.. I didn't hear where they are stationed. Having been in the miltary, I know that everyone will get mandatory blood tests done, so I'm confident they can isolate the situation. It just sucks more for the military because they need to focus on their mission, but now they have to also think about mosquitos.
Edit: The number is a combination of last month's infected service members, which was 18, and this month's number. Many of the service members' family members were also infected. This is happenening overseas, but they srill didn't say exactly where.
No. It isn't a joke. The reality is DDT has been much maligned in large part due to a book filled with junk science from the 1960's. DDT was never shown to be even fractionally as bad as it was painted to be by Rachel Carson. The truth is that many people did die from the DDT substitutes that flooded the market when DDT was banned. DDT was and is the safest and most effective method for mosquito control. It is only because too many environmental nut jobs have pretty much elevated Carson to near messiah level that people are not looking at what was behind her claims. And because of that millions of people die each year from things like malaria which would be much less of a problem if we simply started using DDT again.I'm hoping this is a joke.
So your telling me a virus that can cause sever birth defect and death of a fetus is not a serious enough threat to rank up there with malaria? True Zika might not be of much consequence to a healthy adult but I kind of think babies deserve a bit of consideration as well.'need'? Not in the least; Zika is not malaria. Bringing back DDT in the US would be misguided folly, for a number of reasons, including questionable efficacy.
So are we completely ignoring the effects that DDT has on wildlife?No. It isn't a joke. The reality is DDT has been much maligned in large part due to a book filled with junk science from the 1960's. DDT was never shown to be even fractionally as bad as it was painted to be by Rachel Carson. The truth is that many people did die from the DDT substitutes that flooded the market when DDT was banned. DDT was and is the safest and most effective method for mosquito control. It is only because too many environmental nut jobs have pretty much elevated Carson to near messiah level that people are not looking at what was behind her claims. And because of that millions of people die each year from things like malaria which would be much less of a problem if we simply started using DDT again.
So your telling me a virus that can cause sever birth defect and death of a fetus is not a serious enough threat to rank up there with malaria? True Zika might not be of much consequence to a healthy adult but I kind of think babies deserve a bit of consideration as well.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.