devoy1701
Well-Known Member
I think it's quite possible that someone should be fired, even if it wasn't the situation you lay out. Assume that the powers that be looked to the lead engineeer on the yeti and said "Will this hold up over time?" The lead engineer used his knowledge and experience and was confident that it would work as intended over the long haul, and had no concerns about reliability. He turns out now to have very very wrong. Seems like firing him for simply being bad at his job would be well within the realm of reasonable responses. One needn't be negligent, fraudulent, lazy, or or guilty of withholding information to be in a job he/she isn't qualified for.
I agree to a point, though as Richard has mentioned priviously, it's very possible that everyone on the engineering end was up to par and this was a fail on the contractor and construction super intendent's end.