Maybe not the most popular opinion, but I think Test 2.0 removed a lot of the personality and appeal of the original. It feels so soulless now, where there used to be genuine wonder in learning about how manufacturers test their cars. The new tone just removes any of the excitement or chaos the ride used to have for me especially with that reassuring computer voice. The whole game thing is confusing for me as well, since we have six or so people that designed different cars... all getting in the same physical car.
As for Soarin’, it’s mainly the new video. Any of the original’s raw beauty answer majesty is muddled by CGI whales and awkward transitions. Just ruins the immersion for me.
Soarin Around the World took everything about the California edition and broke it over its knee.
1. CGI. CGI everywhere. Fake whales fake boat rowers, fake kites, fake elephants, fake Taj Mahal in its entirety and the list goes on.
2. The score probably needed to change somewhat to suit the ride better but it's not as charming as the original one
3. The transitions are actually quite frightening at some points. The ones with clouds are fine but.. who's idea was it to fly an AIRPLANE at guests??? It's like some idiot imagineer in the production said "hey that golf ball scene in Soarin Over California? Let's put that at the end of every scene!" Due to this, cast members tell me that there are little kids who are now actually afraid of the ride.
4. The ride itself bites off far more than it can chew. In a period of 5 minutes, you could cover most of California. The scenes in Soarin Around The World are not very cohesive simply because the world is too large.
5. It's out of place in California Adventure. The reason I feel the need to bring this up is the fact that everybody makes the argument that the new version needed to be created for Shanghai (and soon Tokyo as well) because they wouldn't really recognize any of the places in California and that the new version fits the worldly theme of EPCOT better. While this is true, when one makes that argument, they immediately need to address the fact that it took an equally large and awkward step backwards with theming in California Adventure.
6. Oh I almost forgot. How could anyone forget the distortion for 67% of the seats?
So in conclusion, it's not relaxing, immersive or cohesive. I know I may be overdramatic about this but some imagineers should've lost their jobs over the final product. I'd barely consider it a good ride at this point.
ps. I miss the smell of the oranges.