I don't know the Disney fanatics are who helped drive up prices. There aren't enough fanatics to sway them away from some terrible decisions. I don't think there are enough (at least not hard core) fanatics to jack up the prices. I think it's the general public. People say on here that for every fanatic who decides not to go, 4 more from the GP will fill that spot. While I don't really agree with that either, fanatics are just so much smaller a number to make a dent either way. JMO anyway.
For those who notice, sorry for repeating myself, but it's simply supply and demand. As long as there are massive crowds, prices will increase. One cannot complain about huge price increases, and huge crowds at the same time. If you think the crowds are too big now, imagine if they reduced prices. If you want smaller crowds, you should be lauding the price increases and hope for more to think out the crowds. If you want lower prices, you should be hoping for such big prices to get people to not go because that's the only way Disney will reduce prices. The only way to get lower prices is when the balance between revenue and crowds starts to tip the other direction. Once the attendance falls to a point where revenue is lower than before the prices increases, those prices will be scaled back with coupons. With crowds continuing to increase year over year, so will prices.
Oh, and Phil, I'm with you on getting rid of queue skipping systems all together. Disney created a monster with FP. Now it's a monster that is no longer beneficial to the customer in any way. It gots to go!
I would like to think we have all learned something form the last 5 years of history, but maybe not. Pundits have repeatedly said, "X will not happen," and then X happened. Or we were told, "Politician Z cannot do X!" Then Politician Z did exactly X. So yes, it is entirely
possible to complain about BOTH price increases and crowds.
Not only possible, but also possibly legitimate.
Disney has long had the ability to wildly manipulate crowd flow rate, or what I'll call CFR for short.
When you try to enter MK, you might find 3 gates open, or 15 gates open.
You try to buy a magnet and there are 1, 2, or 5 registers open in the gift shop.
Do you wait 5, 10, or 50 minutes for a bus back to your hotel?
IN VERY SIMPLISTIC TERMS: The number of people in MK is only a portion of the total equation. If only one turn-style is open, then the CFR would be very low and a
group of 100 would have to wait in line. Conversely, if 20 turn-styles are open, the CFR will be much higher,
500 people might be able to enter without any wait at all. (Okay, so not quite 0 wait, but seconds instead of minutes.)
Short waits are not good for Disney.
What they want is an acceptable CFR. The more data WDW collects, the more they are able to control CFR.
The problem is that Disney has now decided a much lower crowd flow rate is acceptable. Lower CFR = more $/customer
But if you look at my random example above, it is perfectly possible that
the purple 500 group paid more than the blue 100 group did. Price paid may well be somewhat independent from flow rates.
Disney is very good at advertising and offering 'sales' on Disney vacation packages. WDW prices Pop at $300 for Jan 10th, but then they offer 40% off that rate. It LOOKS like people are getting a 'discount,' but the whole ploy is nothing more than a tool to INCREASE the Jan 10th crowd.
Now if the Jan 10 crowd THINKS Jan 10 is going to be a 'slow' time of year to visit WDW, they will readily tolerate all sorts of CFR reductions, like shorter park hours.
G+ is also just another tool to manipulate us into tolerating a lower flow rate. It is a bit like winning a slot machine. The parkgoer that 'wins' a short attraction wait will happily tolerate a 45minute wait for a bus back to their hotel.
Yes, I am just throwing out random numbers that do not correlate to the real world.
I would counter your last point a little. Americans are complete suckers when it comes to the idea of 'winning.' As long as we think we have won, we are happy, and Disney is an expert in making us think we have won something.