Bryner84
Well-Known Member
Way on purpose...but goal not achieved. What does a futuristic rock look like anyway? Aren't rocks inherently super old?That was that way on purpose, landscapers tried to make it futuristic.
Way on purpose...but goal not achieved. What does a futuristic rock look like anyway? Aren't rocks inherently super old?That was that way on purpose, landscapers tried to make it futuristic.
Way on purpose...but goal not achieved. What does a futuristic rock look like anyway? Aren't rocks inherently super old?
Future Rocks are covered with glitter.Way on purpose...but goal not achieved. What does a futuristic rock look like anyway? Aren't rocks inherently super old?
This is the short sightedness that leads to clones. You want RSR because you know what RSR is. Personally, I want the Imagineers to show us something we haven't seen before. Radiator Springs Racers would be a great addition, but built 5-6 years after the original won't have the same impact.
It looked more futuristic before the rocks were installed.That was that way on purpose, landscapers tried to make it futuristic.
No, those are flamboyant rocks.Future Rocks are covered with glitter.
It would certainly make for an underwhelming finale. Having said that, it's safe to say that a $150 million Cars based attraction (arbitrary number) will probably not stack up that well to Radiator Springs Racers which had a price tag of $340 million. If building RSR didn't affect construction of a Star Wars Land I would be a bigger fan of that. Personally, I think a better move would be to bring in an E-ticket based off another Pixar entity (I could be a hypocrite and say the Ratatouille Ride). The reason they want Cars in place is for the merchandise, but doing a half a$$ed Cars Land could hurt that potential as well.We also don't know anything about this dark ride concept. Supposedly it would include the indoor portions of RSR and not much else. That sounds like a waste of time to me.
Clones of quality attractions aren't a bad thing. In this case, a clone sounds like the best option.
Okay, since when is DC family friendly?
DC is very family friendly. If you think otherwise then you must be frequenting the seedier underbelly that exists in every large city.Okay, since when is DC family friendly?
I agree (and not many people too). While the full RSR would be better, a complete indoor attraction using great sets and animatronics like in RSR with possibly some more show scenes and a change in story can be a great family dark ride.I think the cars dark ride has a lot of potential. Could be one of the better dark rides Disney has ever done IMO
You're right, I always mix them up. The future rocks would be covered with dead Jedi's.No, those are flamboyant rocks.
You mean Congress?DC is very family friendly. If you think otherwise then you must be frequenting the seedier underbelly that exists in every large city.
It would certainly make for an underwhelming finale. Having said that, it's safe to say that a $150 million Cars based attraction (arbitrary number) will probably not stack up that well to Radiator Springs Racers which had a price tag of $340 million. If building RSR didn't affect construction of a Star Wars Land I would be a bigger fan of that. Personally, I think a better move would be to bring in an E-ticket based off another Pixar entity (I could be a hypocrite and say the Ratatouille Ride). The reason they want Cars in place is for the merchandise, but doing a half a$$ed Cars Land could hurt that potential as well.
I want the Star Wars land to be the priority, and given that it seems like it actually exists right now that's a step in the right direction. I suspect that there will probably be clones of whatever is built. However if they're going to do that, it's smarter to build simultaneously.
Let's say the budget is $600 million that would buy you Cars Land as a direct clone from DCA, less Luigi's Flying Tires (the savings could potentially be used for a smaller project like whatever is happening with the Muppets). The other option would be a Star Wars land that already has an E-ticket attraction getting an additional ride, restaurant and whatever else using say 1/2 of that budget with the remaining money being used towards Cars or other Pixar properties.
Personally, I like the second option.
People continue to hold out hope for an expo in Orlando as though continually posting the same thing over and over will somehow get a D23 CM monitoring these boards to say, "Oh yeah, why didnt we think of that!". Why are people so afraid of visiting another resort?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.