bubbles1812
Well-Known Member
Unless Potter 2.0 was a response to the Avatar announcement? There are a lot of unknown variables that'll we'll never figure out. Regardless, I stand by the idea that rising tide and with competition, we all win.
Haha. Sorry. This one made me laugh. Avatar was certainly a jerk reaction to Potter but Potter 2.0 was in no way a jerk reaction to Avatar. It was always down in the contract Uni had with Rowling/WB that they would include things from the later books and movies. If HP hadn't been successful I'm sure said area would have been small. As it were, HP ended up being a runaway success. And why wouldn't you want to do a huge expansion of something that's making you oodles and oodles of money?
I don't think any of what Uni has done is out of fear over what Disney is doing. It's been more of a "hey, we have buttloads of cash. Let's use it" reaction to their own newfound success. And they saw they had something mega successful in Transformers as well so why not bring it to one of your revived parks? It certainly means they are a better competitor to be sure against Disney and I am sure they want that. But again, what they are doing is not from fear. Not to mention Uni already knew it had more money coming down the pipeline to combat it if it ever did get built.
The Avatar announcement as something to "scare" Uni with...sorry I just can't buy it at all. Universal knows how dang slow Disney builds these days. If I were management I probably would have just laughed at said announcement and said, well we'll worry about that one if it ever gets built...probably in about a decade or so.