What would an F-Ticket be?

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
that's a huge stretch, considering there are better attractions in Disneyland.

Have you been on RSR? The only attraction that comes close to RSR at Disneyland is Indy. As a whole, Indy slightly wins because its queue is better than RSR's, in my opinion, but as a ride, RSR takes the cake, without a doubt.
 

J03Y

Well-Known Member
Have you been on RSR? The only attraction that comes close to RSR at Disneyland is Indy. As a whole, Indy slightly wins because its queue is better than RSR's, in my opinion, but as a ride, RSR takes the cake, without a doubt.

no i've never been to it, but it's literally a race track, mixed with some dark ride in it. on whole it shouldn't be that impressive. the whole Radiator Springs town adds to it because it's themed very accurately. Cars isn't even a very beloved Pixar movie, Carsland was a gamble that was played very well because of the themeing and making an attraction similar to the Autopia speedway.

now does it look cool, with how well they've themed it? yes, personally i liked the movie and i think they brought it to life very well. do i think the concept for RSR is cool? yes, i like fast rides. do i think such concepts are the best thing ever? no. literally it's just a small town with maybe one or two kiddie attractions and another Test Track-esque major attraction. ooh so much better than anything Disney could ever come up with. RSR isn't a new ride physically, but the idea was different than what Disney was doing, and i'll grant them that it's a cool idea, and it came at a time when Disneyland was dead for the most part. Carsland was something DLR needed.

while i don't believe it's the best by Disney in America, i think it's the best thing for Disneyland. i mean come on, it brought interest back to the resort, guests flocked to it. hell i even want to see it for myself whenever i go back to DLR, people loved it. and yes personally i find Indy better, but i'd have to experience Carsland for myself before actually saying it.

and another thing, i really don't like everyone in general just throwing hate at WDW and automatically choosing DLR. WDW isn't perfect, you'd have to be naive to think it is. MK needs updating period, MGM is drop dead boring, DAK needs to sort out a balance between wildlife and actual theme park attractions, the only fair park is Epcot and even then it has its own flaws. but people idolize DLR like it can do no wrong, like its this pristine cornerstone of perfection which is complete bs. both DLR and DCA are extremely small, and before you throw "quality over quantity" in my face, yes size matters. everything is crammed in that resort, there is little room to fit anything. i was surprised they were able to fit in Carsland even. quantity may not make something better, but it can still affect its quality. Disney World is not the best thing ever. but neither is DLR. people jump on the Disneyland adoration train when they don't like what's going on with Disney World, which is stupid tbqh. MK may not be the spitting image of gold but it's a million times better than its counterpart. the only thing i love over WDW is DCA, because its theme is actually amazing. that and DisneySea, two things i wish WDW would look at for inspirations in not only their own parks but also if they ever plan on making another one.

end rant, but basically RSR is neither a new concept nor is it the best concept Disney has made for America either.
 

Tuvalu

Premium Member
Would understand your rant more if you have actually ridden RSR and visited Cars Land.

I love WDW and visit several times a year. Last week was my first visit to DLR since 2005. I had read all about RSR and Cars Land beforehand and thought I knew what to expect...once there, the experience blew my expectations out of the water. I enjoyed DCA much more than I thought I would.

I agree that Indy is an excellent ride with a better queue than RSR. However, my OPINION agrees with the OP
who said, "It is a long ride with a crazy amount of detail. It has various types of rides in one (thrill, dark ride). It has an entire land to back it up. A huge facade. It can take over 2000 an hour. And it cost over 200 million."
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
no i've never been to it, but it's literally a race track, mixed with some dark ride in it. on whole it shouldn't be that impressive. the whole Radiator Springs town adds to it because it's themed very accurately. Cars isn't even a very beloved Pixar movie, Carsland was a gamble that was played very well because of the themeing and making an attraction similar to the Autopia speedway.

now does it look cool, with how well they've themed it? yes, personally i liked the movie and i think they brought it to life very well. do i think the concept for RSR is cool? yes, i like fast rides. do i think such concepts are the best thing ever? no. literally it's just a small town with maybe one or two kiddie attractions and another Test Track-esque major attraction. ooh so much better than anything Disney could ever come up with. RSR isn't a new ride physically, but the idea was different than what Disney was doing, and i'll grant them that it's a cool idea, and it came at a time when Disneyland was dead for the most part. Carsland was something DLR needed.

while i don't believe it's the best by Disney in America, i think it's the best thing for Disneyland. i mean come on, it brought interest back to the resort, guests flocked to it. hell i even want to see it for myself whenever i go back to DLR, people loved it. and yes personally i find Indy better, but i'd have to experience Carsland for myself before actually saying it.

and another thing, i really don't like everyone in general just throwing hate at WDW and automatically choosing DLR. WDW isn't perfect, you'd have to be naive to think it is. MK needs updating period, MGM is drop dead boring, DAK needs to sort out a balance between wildlife and actual theme park attractions, the only fair park is Epcot and even then it has its own flaws. but people idolize DLR like it can do no wrong, like its this pristine cornerstone of perfection which is complete bs. both DLR and DCA are extremely small, and before you throw "quality over quantity" in my face, yes size matters. everything is crammed in that resort, there is little room to fit anything. i was surprised they were able to fit in Carsland even. quantity may not make something better, but it can still affect its quality. Disney World is not the best thing ever. but neither is DLR. people jump on the Disneyland adoration train when they don't like what's going on with Disney World, which is stupid tbqh. MK may not be the spitting image of gold but it's a million times better than its counterpart. the only thing i love over WDW is DCA, because its theme is actually amazing. that and DisneySea, two things i wish WDW would look at for inspirations in not only their own parks but also if they ever plan on making another one.

end rant, but basically RSR is neither a new concept nor is it the best concept Disney has made for America either.

Oh dear. You haven't even ridden it, therefore I can't take your experience seriously.

When did this conversation turn into a WDW vs DLR topic? It shouldn't matter if people prefer WDW or the DLR. They're both Disney. Don't let it upset you. I'm sure no one here believes the DLR is perfect and the majority of people here prefer WDW to the DLR.

BTW, Disney always finds a way to fit in things at the DLR. Where there's a will, there's a way.
 

WED99

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
no i've never been to it, but it's literally a race track, mixed with some dark ride in it. on whole it shouldn't be that impressive. the whole Radiator Springs town adds to it because it's themed very accurately. Cars isn't even a very beloved Pixar movie, Carsland was a gamble that was played very well because of the themeing and making an attraction similar to the Autopia speedway.

now does it look cool, with how well they've themed it? yes, personally i liked the movie and i think they brought it to life very well. do i think the concept for RSR is cool? yes, i like fast rides. do i think such concepts are the best thing ever? no. literally it's just a small town with maybe one or two kiddie attractions and another Test Track-esque major attraction. ooh so much better than anything Disney could ever come up with. RSR isn't a new ride physically, but the idea was different than what Disney was doing, and i'll grant them that it's a cool idea, and it came at a time when Disneyland was dead for the most part. Carsland was something DLR needed.

while i don't believe it's the best by Disney in America, i think it's the best thing for Disneyland. i mean come on, it brought interest back to the resort, guests flocked to it. hell i even want to see it for myself whenever i go back to DLR, people loved it. and yes personally i find Indy better, but i'd have to experience Carsland for myself before actually saying it.

and another thing, i really don't like everyone in general just throwing hate at WDW and automatically choosing DLR. WDW isn't perfect, you'd have to be naive to think it is. MK needs updating period, MGM is drop dead boring, DAK needs to sort out a balance between wildlife and actual theme park attractions, the only fair park is Epcot and even then it has its own flaws. but people idolize DLR like it can do no wrong, like its this pristine cornerstone of perfection which is complete bs. both DLR and DCA are extremely small, and before you throw "quality over quantity" in my face, yes size matters. everything is crammed in that resort, there is little room to fit anything. i was surprised they were able to fit in Carsland even. quantity may not make something better, but it can still affect its quality. Disney World is not the best thing ever. but neither is DLR. people jump on the Disneyland adoration train when they don't like what's going on with Disney World, which is stupid tbqh. MK may not be the spitting image of gold but it's a million times better than its counterpart. the only thing i love over WDW is DCA, because its theme is actually amazing. that and DisneySea, two things i wish WDW would look at for inspirations in not only their own parks but also if they ever plan on making another one.

end rant, but basically RSR is neither a new concept nor is it the best concept Disney has made for America either.
It's just a race track with dark ride scenes? So I guess ToT is just a drop ride with some dark scenes tacked on too. And Splash is just a flume ride with some dark ride scenes too.

I can't wait for you to ride it then when you come back and read this you'll break your nose because you'll face palm so hard. "Similar to the autopia attraction" Yeh and Red is similar to green.
 

PUSH

Well-Known Member
The first things I think of with the letter "F" is failure. But since we are talking better than an E-ticket, then I'd have to go with the Rapunzel bathrooms. :cool:
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
Kilimanjaro Safaris. All too easily taken for granted.

The old two hour Backlot Tour. The backbone of an entire park.

Horizons. Scale, size and scope.


...and Mr. Toad's Wild Ride for sheer zany epicness.


I'd definitely agree with you on the Safaris and the original Backlot tour.
Few Disney attractions have the scope necessary to possibly qualify as their own standalone experiences outside of a theme park setting and those two qualify.

Horizons, while sorely missed, didn't really stand out from the other 4 massive omnimovers in the original Future World.
 

bethymouse

Well-Known Member
F ticket to me may be something like a big outdoor roller coaster that requires heights of 54" or more. Perhaps like California Screamin.?:eek: But, I know that will never happen @ WDW,:(
I agree w/ many on here though, "F" seems to stand more for failure, but there's always room for improvement!;)
 

GiveMeTheMusic

Well-Known Member
The only attraction I've ever been on that exceeded what an E Ticket means is Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey.

And honest to God, you can't say Radiator Springs Racers ISN'T the best Disney attraction in America if you've never been on it, and YouTube does NOT count. RSR surpasses DHS' TOT, a ride that I love but only has 2-3 show scenes. Now picking between RSR and Indy is a little more difficult, but RSR shares but one thing with Test Track, and that's a ride system. Saying you know what RSR is like because you've been on TT is like saying you know what Harry Potter is like because you've been on Sum of All Thrills.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
F ticket to me may be something like a big outdoor roller coaster that requires heights of 54" or more. Perhaps like California Screamin.?:eek: But, I know that will never happen @ WDW,:(
I agree w/ many on here though, "F" seems to stand more for failure, but there's always room for improvement!;)

54 inches?
like 4 1/2 feet?

Scary!!!!


Oh, you mean riders' heights!
laugh2.gif
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
I really hate seeing RSR dismissed as "just Test Track". Is it the same basic ride system? Yes, but the comparisons stop there. RSR is a complete and fully fleshed-out ride experience... the scope of the attraction alone is impressive - doesn't it have one of the biggest footprints of any Disney ride, ignoring KSR, Backlot Tour(s), and Jungle Cruise? The rockwork is beautiful and not only serves to enhance as a backdrop to the ride but also the whole land. The animatronics are very impressive. Personally I think the fact that it can split one ride path into two, pair up two cars, and sync them up to actually race them is pretty impressive.

Another thing I think is great about it is that they created a new story and experience that puts YOU into it, unlike Mermaid, for example, which just has you observing a brief re-cap of the movie... no inspiration, no imagination. Just... "here's a few scenes from the movie. Thanks for riding!"

So, yes its based on Cars, but it shows that they can still go all out and get everything right when they want to.
 

juniorthomas

Well-Known Member
An F-ticket would have to be something completely new. It would have to be larger than a current E-ticket. Maybe a combination of an immersive ridethrough AND a traditional E-ticket. All timing and flow issues aside, that's the best way to make a better E-ticket.

Most E-tickets are what, 2 minutes long? Why not make your F-ticket something that's 10 minutes or longer. For example, a Monsters, Inc ride that starts with an interactive kid scaring game, then moves to chasing Boo through the MI halls, and ends with the doors coaster. (Clearly, I don't work at TDO or WDI).

So basically, one ride made up of multiple rides. Building more of an experience around one property, instead of a 120 second visit to that world. Not exactly revolutionary, but it would at least justify the F-ticket name (and the three hour line).
 

The Empress Lilly

Well-Known Member
An F-ticket would have to be something completely new. It would have to be larger than a current E-ticket. Maybe a combination of an immersive ridethrough AND a traditional E-ticket. All timing and flow issues aside, that's the best way to make a better E-ticket.

Most E-tickets are what, 2 minutes long? Why not make your F-ticket something that's 10 minutes or longer. For example, a Monsters, Inc ride that starts with an interactive kid scaring game, then moves to chasing Boo through the MI halls, and ends with the doors coaster. (Clearly, I don't work at TDO or WDI).

So basically, one ride made up of multiple rides. Building more of an experience around one property, instead of a 120 second visit to that world. Not exactly revolutionary, but it would at least justify the F-ticket name (and the three hour line).
That would be cool! How about we go one better and develop an F-ticket not of ten, but of fifteen minutes. Where you are suspended in mid air in front of an imax screen, like Soarin, but then with two screens! But mostly real sets, massive, bigger than Pirates, with lots of AA's. That will take you everywhere, future cities, underwater, outer space, orange groves. And oh, it will also include a video ending, like SSE, you get to choose, but fun fastpaced vids, and not on a small iPad-like screen, but one big ones, after all this is 2013. We'll figure out a way to make the screen move with you!

Okay, so that's all a bit unrealistic, but you know what they say, if we can dream it!
 

WDWFREAK53

Well-Known Member
I don't think I'd consider any attraction higher than an "E".
I would, however, consider an experience an "F" ticket.

Hands-on, true to life, experiences. Richard Petty Racing Experience comes to mind. You are actually behind the wheel...not on a track...not simulated.

(And, for the record...I think Spider-Man is a better attraction than Harry Potter *ducks* )
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom