Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Wouldn’t it just be easier to reskin a cheap old ride and then charge?I'm going against the grain and betting they will announce 1 or 2 new E Tickets so they can charge for ILL access.
Wouldn’t it just be easier to reskin a cheap old ride and then charge?I'm going against the grain and betting they will announce 1 or 2 new E Tickets so they can charge for ILL access.
Yep…it’s all about launch angle and exit velo nowYes. And it was a nice break for my and two of my kids while more adventurous son (and wife) rode RNRC next door.
Not everything needs to be a home run. Doubles and singles have their place. The problem is even doubles cost as much as a home run due to how TWDC does things now, so they only swing for home runs.
Which is strange, because Mermaid cost at least twice as much as every other comparable ride.100%. I like Mermaid but it feels too cheap for something so modern. It deserved a bit more.
But they’re not just what people think. They’re still used to describe attractions in the industry. The Pandora drawings that got out label Navi River Journey as the C Ticket. Even over at Epic Universe the different new attractions are referred to by their ticket level.
Popularity could influence changes over the years, but the base criteria was scale and scope. Peter Pan’s Flight was never elevated to an E Ticket like the Jungle Cruise because its scale and scope were not there despite its popularity.
The issue with Nemo and Mermaid is less that they're not groundbreaking and more that they're just unsatisfying. There are plenty of attractions that aren't groundbreaking but still manage to scratch the itch for the guests.
WDI for the last decadeWhich is strange, because Mermaid cost at least twice as much as every other comparable ride.
The biggest difference between Pooh and Mermaid is that Mermaid has fabulous placemaking that promises a better ride than it delivers. Winnie the Pooh is a ride of comparable ambition (2 or 3 nice Animatronics aside), but its outside sets up an expectation that matches the experience. As much as I enjoy Mermaid's exterior, they should have either scaled back so not to overwhelm the ride and raise guests hopes or they should have pumped up the ride to match them.
Why does such a "cute" ride have a more impressive exterior than Pirates of the Caribbean?
Year of construction…is the answer to your question.Which is strange, because Mermaid cost at least twice as much as every other comparable ride.
The biggest difference between Pooh and Mermaid is that Mermaid has fabulous placemaking that promises a better ride than it delivers. Winnie the Pooh is a ride of comparable ambition (2 or 3 nice Animatronics aside), but its outside sets up an expectation that matches the experience. As much as I enjoy Mermaid's exterior, they should have either scaled back so not to overwhelm the ride and raise guests hopes or they should have pumped up the ride to match them.
Why does such a "cute" ride have a more impressive exterior than Pirates of the Caribbean?
IMO the biggest issue is that they announce all these new attractions when they are still in the planning stages. What they need to do is announce new attractions once they get to the construction phase.Year of construction…is the answer to your question.
Remember that bobs minions MASSIVELY over promised on “new fantasyland” too.
Not much came out of it for years of bluster.
Now you’ve got me wondering if they’re going to use ILL as a way to justify building new E/D tickets at a higher rate.I'm going against the grain and betting they will announce 1 or 2 new E Tickets so they can charge for ILL access.
Yes, plus why build a D/C when for the same space and fraction of the cost you could squeeze in three shops and a small counter service place that returns immediate $$Now you’ve got me wondering if they’re going to use ILL as a way to justify building new E/D tickets at a higher rate.
That’s the way it used to be…but the internet and digital speed media has killed everythingIMO the biggest issue is that they announce all these new attractions when they are still in the planning stages. What they need to do is announce new attractions once they get to the construction phase.
Possible…but I doubt it. Bob is “not too veiled” been saying they can make money out of nothing…and he has alot of skin In that gameNow you’ve got me wondering if they’re going to use ILL as a way to justify building new E/D tickets at a higher rate.
I personally think they are gonna announce something big for florida..thats just a feeling I have though.That’s the way it used to be…but the internet and digital speed media has killed everything
Possible…but I doubt it. Bob is “not to veiled” been saying they can make money out of nothing…and he has alot of skin In that game
1. I hope you’re rightI personally think they are gonna announce something big for florida..thats just a feeling I have though.
I believe Mermaid scratches just barely enough, and Nemo doesn't.The issue with Nemo and Mermaid is less that they're not groundbreaking and more that they're just unsatisfying. There are plenty of attractions that aren't groundbreaking but still manage to scratch the itch for the guests.
I believe Mermaid scratches just barely enough, and Nemo doesn't.
But again, I firmly believe a few extra Nemos and Mermaid rides would be fine.
Plus, people forget that there are a whole bunch of 1-8 year olds visiting the parks as well.I actually disagree with both.
Mermaid is a time filler…which they need a lot more of…
Nemo was a retheme of a dead ride. People forget that…it was adding something to a decayed legacy Epcot pavilion. Not groundbreaking…but better than decay and doom as in at least 3 other areas of that park
I disagree... In fact, I believe the queue and facade are one of the main reasons why I enjoy the attraction for what it is. Meanwhile, if you caught me over at California Adventure, I wouldn't even think to step foot in that ride.The biggest issues with Mermaid are the queue/facade, which sets expectations the ride can't meet, and the amount of money they spent on it. It's a bit like Guardians in that if you know how much it cost, you're thinking "where the heck did the money go?"
I think WDW DESPERATELY needs more Winnie the Poohs, Peter Pan's Flights, and Snow White's Scary Adventures (RIP).I believe Mermaid scratches just barely enough, and Nemo doesn't.
But again, I firmly believe a few extra Nemos and Mermaid rides would be fine.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.