And every state in the country has amusement parks, yet somehow we think of Disney differently.
Yet you and others refuse to see the project as something different. There is a fanatical determination to point out that this project is no different than any other mall in the country.
Bzzzt. The most unique and important aspect of PI was that it was for adults. That's the only reason I went. Very little children to be seen. Sure, I liked the AC just like everyone, but I pretty much club hopped.
Krack, have you ever considered that maybe WDW isn't the place for you if you don't like kids?
Kids just didn't magically start going to WDW after your sweet spot of 1994.
Whether true or not, you coming across as having a very strong dislike of children. It's really like going to Olive Garden when you don't like pasta. Sure there are other things on the menu, but you're getting away from the reason to go there.
Which brings us to the essential two part question of this entire thread (and the HW project itself) ...
1. Is this concept likely to entice more people to visit the WDW Resort (or spend longer stays) than would of if it didn't exist (or if something different existed in the same area - an "is the money and space being used wisely" question)? and ...
Was PI extending stays? I'm not sure any of us have that information, but logic would dictate that it was probably a no.
The clubs where generally a place to go after the parks close. There would be no reason to extend your stay.
However, to play along with your illogical charade, it could. By providing DTD with a more cohesive theme from end to end, you make the whole area enticing for people to experience.
By increasing the amount of shops and restaurants you are requiring more time for people to experience the whole thing. Instead of Marketplace being the only viable shopping area you have extended it and easily connected it to West Side.
I don't think anyone has every extended their stay just to experience DTD or PI.
2. Personally, for each of us individually, is this concept likely to be somewhere that we (individually) will visit regularly when visiting WDW?
For my family, if the restaurants are unique and unavailable to us where we live and the shops are interesting, yes. Since I can't tell any of that from the press release or the drawings, I am content to wait until the product is finished. This differs from you and the rest of the naysayers is that you have already made up your mind.
For question two, I can say I'll probably go there once (to see what it's all about) and then spend my evenings in the parks for the rest of Hyperion Wharf's existence. Unless, of course, as I stated earlier in the thread there is some sort of nighttime spectacle (light show, water show) that I consider to be can't miss - that would draw me there. I make this personal prediction because this is my approach to the rest of DTD - I stopped going to the Marketplace years ago (the only real reason I went was because I was going to PI anyway, before the PI admission gates being removed) and I only went to Westside once. When I'm on vacation (particularly at Disney rates), I'm not interested in going to the mall. That's my personal opinion.
Nightclubs with adults and a refuge from kids (particularly in Disney vacation)? That's something that had (and still has) personal value for me. A lot of value actually. I don't like other peoples' children, but I like Disney parks - sue me. I don't stop other people from seeking what they like; if anybody wants to go to a character meal ... have fun. Just as long as the things I like to do don't start systematically disappearing so that everything in the resort is 9 different but similar versions of the things you like to do. At that point I feel perfectly justified voicing displeasure.
If a nightclub is truly what you want, there are still options. Atlantic Dance, Jellyrolls, and Rix Lounge. However, I'm sure you will come up with reasons why these don't fit your needs.
The answer to the first question is surely up for debate. How many people think like I do? How many people want a day where all they do is shop in the middle of their vacation? How many locals will ditch City Walk for Hyperion Wharf (I still hate that name the more I hear it, but I digress ...)? What third party vendors will fill the spaces? And will Disney be able to lock them into long term leases so there isn't constant turnover? Is a highly themed wharf enough of a draw on it's own (in other words, is that as exciting as say Adventureland's theming or even one of the WS countries?)?
All important questions to be discussed, but if someone's attitude is "Hey, you can't express the view point that HW is not a place you will want to visit" or "Hey, you can't give reasons why you think the HW concept might not be the best idea" then I think you are out of luck, because this is a Disney message board and expressing view points (both positive and negative) is what people do.
If the questions were all that were discuss that would be a different story. If it were a true discussion it would be a different story.
All that has really gone on in this thread is a boiling down of the concept to its basic parts and then comparing those parts to a mall, as you have done.
It has gotten so bad that the poster who brought us some inside information is declining to post here any more.
That's not a discussion, that's b****ing and moaning about something that's not built yet.
While it was a bad decision for WDW to handle the closure of PI the way they did and they could have arguably "saved" the clubs with a serious investment, they are re-purposing this space with a different concept.
The success of this concept depends on several factors we simply don't have access to at this point.
Whether you personally like it or not has no bearing on the success or failure of Hyperion Wharf. The very small percentage of vacationer that make up the membership of this website are in no way a reflection of the general traveling public.