Because the reasonable approach would be to use reusable straws when convenient and disposable straws in situations where it is more convenient to do so. For instance, I use reusable straws at home to take drinks into my car. However, when I'm on a road trip and buy a drink at a gas station, it is more convenient to use a disposable straw so I don't have to deal with washing straws and things like that. At WDW, if I want to walk around with a drink I need a lid and a straw to not make a mess. It is not convenient to carry a reusable straw around with me in a theme park nor a reusable drink lid.
That is what I consider a "reasonable" solution to cutting back on waste, minimizing waste at home but not taking crazy steps to make it difficult to enjoy the conveniences of modern civilization while on vacation.
Wait, how is what Disney is doing not EXACTLY what you just said?
They are replacing plastic straws with paper ones. The straws still exist, the lids still exist. You can still get them. If you consider having to ask for them a "crazy step" then that is certainly your prerogative but we have very different ideas of crazy.
The people who want "all or nothing" are the ones in favor of this kind of policy. They want to ban plastic straws when there is no compelling reason to do so. In the US, if they are disposed of in a trash can (as they would all be at WDW, either by the guest or a custodial CM), there is no "environmental damage."
Okay, but they haven't banned straws, they just switched to a different material. Second, the US ships an absurd amount of trash (in particular plastic) to other countries to deal with so no, it ended up in a trash can does not mean there is no environmental impact. That is an assumption on your part, that in some cases will be correct and some cases not.
In the specific case of Disney, you may be right if it all stays local which I believe at least a good bit of it does. My understanding is that is one of the reasons they want to switch to paper straws instead of the plastic. It will use up significantly less space over time in a land fill.
Just in case anyone wants to talk about how small a straw is that is true. Now multiple that be the millions of guests who use them on property each year. With the paper you only ever have a few months of straws at any one time eating up space in a landfill as anything older will be fully decomposed while the plastic will be there for the next 100+ years taking up room.
These policies serve to make two groups of people fell good about themselves. The first group are the people within the company who come up with the policies and then get to pretend that they are saving the earth. The second group are the people who keep a close eye on their carbon footprint and inherently feel guilty about going to WDW. They see initiatives like this and it makes them feel good that the business they are patronizing is saving the earth so they no longer have to feel guilty about the "impact" they have by going to WDW.
Reductive and inaccurate. This is exactly what I was talking about with the absolutes. Just because you can't imagine anything other than the groups you listed doesn't mean that is all that exists or that those are even a tiny majority of the people who support these types of policy changes.
Here, I'll help. I support this change, feel zero pleasure or self-satisfaction from it and derive no sense of accomplishment. I also drive a car, will fly when needed and purchase other products that use or contain plastic and feel no guilt when doing so. You know why, because I live in reality where complex, insanely difficult to solve problems can't be fixed instantly but still shouldn't be ignored entirely.
If you are an environmental activist and really want to make a difference to eliminate plastic pollution in the ocean then do what the whale hunting protesters did and get a bunch of boats and harass the garbage barges leaving China and the several other Asian countries who are the main contributors to the problem and make it a mission to stop allowing them to dump plastic in the ocean. THAT would be "doing something" to help the environment, not eliminating single use plastics at WDW.
Sure, that is one option but not everyone can do this kind of thing or even would agree that is the best approach.
For example, why not start at home. We (the US) ship a lot of our trash to other countries where it then ends up in the ocean. How about stopping that practice? No, that wouldn't stop another country from dumping their own trash but it would be a large if incremental step forward. Besides, I guarantee that if trash started piling up locally solutions and progress would start coming at a much quicker pace which is what we really need to solve this issue long term.
"Doing what you can" is a stalling action to buy time for real, more realistic and permeant solutions to come along.