News Walt Disney World and other major Disney accounts stop posting on social media platform X

Cliff

Well-Known Member
So...I don't use Twitter but I have read that Disney (and others) have stopped spending add money on "X" because of severe morality issues with "X" or Elon that they do NOT want to be a part of or be associated with?

But,..I have read that Disney's online social media teams STILL use "X" and have no problem posting regularly to promote themselves and their products? It seems that Disney's media and marketing teams have zero concerns about "X's" morality in the way that Disney AdSales does????

Correct me if I'm wrong...but this is only a Disney AdSales protest...but NOT a Disney Social Media Marketing protest?

In other words...Disney AdSales does NOT want to associate with "X" but Disney Marketing DOES want to associate with "X"?????
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
So...I don't use Twitter but I have read that Disney (and others) have stopped spending add money on "X" because of severe morality issues with "X" or Elon that they do NOT want to be a part of or be associated with?

But,..I have read that Disney's online social media teams STILL use "X" and have no problem posting regularly to promote themselves and their products? It seems that Disney's media and marketing teams have zero concerns about "X's" morality in the way that Disney AdSales does????

Correct me if I'm wrong...but this is only a Disney AdSales protest...but NOT a Disney Social Media Marketing protest?

In other words...Disney AdSales does NOT want to associate with "X" but Disney Marketing DOES want to associate with "X"?????
I think it has more to do with Disney not wanting their advertising below certain posts more than anything.

As far as I can tell, that's the association they're not wanting to make after the owner of the company drew extra attention to everything, himself, by originally chiming in... of course, making things worse by refusing to shut up about it all, now, too.

... which is his right but there's that whole freedom of speach does not equal freedom from consequences thing at play here and I think it's been a while (maybe not since he had to purchase Twitter after his trolling with all of that backfired) that this man has had to deal with consequences that actually impacted him in any real way.
 
Last edited:

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
So...I don't use Twitter but I have read that Disney (and others) have stopped spending add money on "X" because of severe morality issues with "X" or Elon that they do NOT want to be a part of or be associated with?

But,..I have read that Disney's online social media teams STILL use "X" and have no problem posting regularly to promote themselves and their products? It seems that Disney's media and marketing teams have zero concerns about "X's" morality in the way that Disney AdSales does????

Correct me if I'm wrong...but this is only a Disney AdSales protest...but NOT a Disney Social Media Marketing protest?

In other words...Disney AdSales does NOT want to associate with "X" but Disney Marketing DOES want to associate with "X"?????
There’s a difference between giving them money by buying ads vs. just using the site.
 

Stripes

Premium Member
I am positive allowing the man who called the cold-blooded massacre of children a "hoax" back on twitter will bring companies stampeding to throw their ad money at twitter. 🙄🙄🙄
He also hosted a Space today with himself, Alex Jones, and Andrew Tate. He’s not just allowing their drivel he’s elevating both of their voices. Either Elon needs medical attention or he’s deliberately trying to devalue Twitter/bankrupt the company.

At this point, I can’t think of another likely explanation for his actions.
 

WoundedDreamer

Well-Known Member
Other then that, Iger frequently works with people with whom he disagrees politically. Much of the criticism of Iger is that he's a soulless, impersonal business automaton. He makes decisions to make money.

The idea Musk embarrassed Iger is absurd. Iger is far more self-confident then Musk and realizes that his little tantrum made Musk look like a tiny little man to anyone who wasn't already a Musk sycophant.
I think this view of Iger has largely been discredited over the last few years. Just recently in this press we have learned a number of unflattering details about Bob Iger's emotional maturity. Examples include...
1) Iger was horrified that his successor lost his temper and said a curse word
2) He was offended when Chapek wanted to study by himself instead of preparing together for a shareholder presentation (talk about neediness)
3) Iger lashed out at Chapek for scheduling a routine meeting with the CFO
4) He was hurt that Chapek didn't revere him enough
5) He worked to topple his chosen successor through subversive and ultimately cowardly means

Iger once, rather ironically, lashed out at Disney Parks fans on Twitter. In a bizarre Tweet in the aftermath of insulting Expedition Everest, Iger jabbed at the company's devoted fanbase:


Because it's funny to mock people who are concerned with the declining quality of projects and toonification of the theme parks. It's a good thing he didn't move forward with his plan, given the abysmal box office performance of The Marvels.

The entire concept of "Disney Nice" that he has embraced as his corporate culture is an example of emotional immaturity. It's clear from information about the Chapek debacle, that the executive team struggles to speak boldly and directly to one another. This results in passive-aggressiveness and petty backstabbing. Again, ironic, because Walt Disney was not afraid to speak bluntly and directly to his subordinates. And stories from Walt Disney Productions make it clear that the company culture had a high level of accountability. And Iger's idol Steve Jobs also was known to be... Direct.

And then there was the self-congratulatory Masterclass series he did. And the "Ride of a Lifetime." And other projects to specifically pump up his legacy and ego.

Admittedly, Elon Musk might be one of the most emotionally erratic business leaders I've ever seen. He can be extremely impulsive. Sometimes the impulses can be genius, and other times moronic. But let's not kid ourselves and think Iger is a machveiallian business leader. He's shown time and again his own different emotional immaturity.

Edit: I'll add, the reason he got the reputation as the "soulless businessman only out for money" was his disregard for the parks. I think the truth is he just didn't really care about the parks. If you don't care about something (except for Shanghai Disney and the Galaxies Edge which are monuments to Igerness), you can leave that to the accountants and MBAs to run. And they were the ones who were the soulless businessmen extracting every cent out of the park. That or they are just incompetent.
 
Last edited:

ohioguy

Well-Known Member
He also hosted a Space today with himself, Alex Jones, and Andrew Tate. He’s not just allowing their drivel he’s elevating both of their voices. Either Elon needs medical attention or he’s deliberately trying to devalue Twitter/bankrupt the company.

At this point, I can’t think of another likely explanation for his actions.

Allowing these people back on Twitter/X tells us all we need to know about Elon Musk. Most have had enough.
 

osian

Well-Known Member
He also hosted a Space today with himself, Alex Jones, and Andrew Tate. He’s not just allowing their drivel he’s elevating both of their voices. Either Elon needs medical attention or he’s deliberately trying to devalue Twitter/bankrupt the company.

At this point, I can’t think of another likely explanation for his actions.

It might be a case of X being "too big to fail" (it's still going strong despite everything) theerfore he feels confident in using the platform to progress his own agenda.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
He also hosted a Space today with himself, Alex Jones, and Andrew Tate. He’s not just allowing their drivel he’s elevating both of their voices. Either Elon needs medical attention or he’s deliberately trying to devalue Twitter/bankrupt the company.

At this point, I can’t think of another likely explanation for his actions.
Not liking people who harass grieving parents of murdered children and engage in human trafficking and assault is clearly just blind partisanship. Why wouldn’t a business focused on families want to be more associated with this? 🙄
 

J4546

Well-Known Member
For real. Elon bringing Alex Jones back to twitter/x says a lot about who elon is. Trash. Just last year he said he never allow Alex Jones back lol. So desperate to keep people on twitter you start catering to the worst people to give you support. Reminds me of certain politcal parties in the last decade lol
 

Willmark

Well-Known Member
Musk can run X anyway he wants and if he wants to allow people to spread whatever BS they want that is fine. He just has no leg to stand on when people walk away when he supports the things those people say. Free market at its best.
I'm (likely) one of the biggest proponents of free speech around here and also (likely) one of the most capitalistic.

Money goes where it's welcome IMO.
 

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
Elon has more issues. Nearly all of the Teslas on the road are being recalled for the autopilot item.
Just realized Elon probably getting Eisner and Iger mixed up with the way he is spelling it lol. I implore this man to read more than Twitter. It is not real life.
 

DisneyCane

Well-Known Member
Elon has more issues. Nearly all of the Teslas on the road are being recalled for the autopilot item.
While it is technically a "recall," it's being done by an over the air software update. It's not like everybody driving a Tesla needs to make a service appointment. Depending on their deal with wireless data providers, the cost might be next to nothing.

A few times I have had recalls on my vehicles that were fixed by a software update but I had to go to the dealership for a service appointment so they could upgrade the software by cable.
 

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
While it is technically a "recall," it's being done by an over the air software update. It's not like everybody driving a Tesla needs to make a service appointment. Depending on their deal with wireless data providers, the cost might be next to nothing.

A few times I have had recalls on my vehicles that were fixed by a software update but I had to go to the dealership for a service appointment so they could upgrade the software by cable.
My Mustang Mach-E had a couple recalls that were done as OTA software updates as well. This is really a nothing-burger (if it actually fixes the complaints which is another question)
 

DisneyCane

Well-Known Member
My Mustang Mach-E had a couple recalls that were done as OTA software updates as well. This is really a nothing-burger (if it actually fixes the complaints which is another question)
It seems like automakers are building in OTA update capability on their electric cars but, for some reason, can't seem to do it for ICE vehicles (at least Ford and GM from what I've seen). Most likely because they have everything separated into multiple computers and they can't work together beyond things for functionality. My F-150 can have the infotainment system updated OTA but not the ECU. It wouldn't have taken a leap of innovation to design it so the infotainment GPU could update the ECU software. Instead, I'm supposed to be on the lookout for some bizarre engine noise and, only if it happens, take it to a dealership for a software update.
 

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
It seems like automakers are building in OTA update capability on their electric cars but, for some reason, can't seem to do it for ICE vehicles (at least Ford and GM from what I've seen). Most likely because they have everything separated into multiple computers and they can't work together beyond things for functionality. My F-150 can have the infotainment system updated OTA but not the ECU. It wouldn't have taken a leap of innovation to design it so the infotainment GPU could update the ECU software. Instead, I'm supposed to be on the lookout for some bizarre engine noise and, only if it happens, take it to a dealership for a software update.
Yeah, there's maybe only 1 or two modules on the Mach-E and Lightning that can't be updated OTA. The rest is kind of a Rube Goldberg machine, but it works lol.
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
My Mustang Mach-E had a couple recalls that were done as OTA software updates as well. This is really a nothing-burger (if it actually fixes the complaints which is another question)
A Mustang Mach E reminds me of a sacrilege but unfortunately it is the sign of the times. I will keep enjoying my V6 naturally aspirated hydraulic steering stick shift, buttons and dials etc.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom