WondersOfLife
Blink, blink. Breathe, breathe. Day in, day out.
And you're saying the coaster themed to india was bad or good?The Roller Coaster Themed to India or Whatever opened in 2006.
And you're saying the coaster themed to india was bad or good?The Roller Coaster Themed to India or Whatever opened in 2006.
If you think it's bad now, just remember that the original version was even worse. As the jets of water spun around and rose up and down, the whole effect was just a lot more...phallic. They added the splashes to the tops of the plastic water before the DCA attraction opened to the public, but after it had been ridden by tens of thousands of CMs and their invited guests.Regarding the kiss the girl scene - the plastic water coming out of the fish in that scene is my most hated moment of any theme park attraction I think... well until Pixar Pier was complete. They give it a run for the money.
If you think it's bad now, just remember that the original version was even worse. As the jets of water spun around and rose up and down, the whole effect was just a lot more...phallic. They added the splashes to the tops of the plastic water before the DCA attraction opened to the public, but after it had been ridden by tens of thousands of CMs and their invited guests.
Somehow, the stock photo that was taken during the original configuration still design makes its way into various publications. As good as Disney is at getting things scrubbed from the internet ("oddly waifish main of anemic personality"; "some nondescript named coaster somewhere that maybe is like, maybe is in India or whatever"; etc.), this has always managed to allude them
This is yet another simple misstep that they should have caught during the design phase, but wasn't noticed until after being seen by the (semi-)public. Someone could write a book on all the elementary mistakes that were somehow built (twice!) with this allegedly-basic dark ride with a shockingly-high cost.
Why does that matter? A nearly 200' tall mountain is a much larger scope than a rather simple building.And you're saying the coaster themed to india was bad or good?
If you think it's bad now, just remember that the original version was even worse. As the jets of water spun around and rose up and down, the whole effect was just a lot more...phallic.
I’m glad they learned their lesson.
*looks at Pixar Pier logo*
Oh.... never mind.
Link to the attraction please?Why does that matter? A nearly 200' tall mountain is a much larger scope than a rather simple building.
Link to the attraction please?
I thought this thread was about Voyage of the Little Mermaid at Hollywood Studios?
I thought the original post was about Voyage of the Little Mermaid at Hollywood Studios?
The show is called "King Triton's Concert", here's some photos.
Better video footage
It's one of those shows "that videos won't do justice and have to see in person".
That's true, I forgot to mention the change to the animation. I think the painting of King Triton's Castle in the tunnel before Under the Sea was a later add too.It’s like your car. If you’re too cheap to change the oil eventually you’ll have to pay for more expensive repairs. That’s very much how Disney operates. They drag their feet until they’re forced to do something and it ends up costing more which is further compounded by rising costs, which encourages more feet dragging. The notion of “Look at all that they’re spending now” misses the larger narrative.
I don’t have those numbers handy but newer attractions are a bad comparison because costs have spiraled out of control since 2006 (meaning return on invest has become worse). The previous $100 million attraction was the Roller Coaster Themed to India or Whatever and more recently Pixar Pier cost more than that.
If I remember correctly, the changes were done over at least two closures. There was also the change to the animation of Ariel getting legs and small tweaks to the other animatronics.
If you think it's bad now, just remember that the original version was even worse. As the jets of water spun around and rose up and down, the whole effect was just a lot more...phallic. They added the splashes to the tops of the plastic water before the DCA attraction opened to the public, but after it had been ridden by tens of thousands of CMs and their invited guests.
Somehow, the stock photo that was taken during the original configuration still design makes its way into various publications. As good as Disney is at getting things scrubbed from the internet ("oddly waifish main of anemic personality"; "some nondescript named coaster somewhere that maybe is like, maybe is in India or whatever"; etc.), this has always managed to allude them
This is yet another simple misstep that they should have caught during the design phase, but wasn't noticed until after being seen by the (semi-)public. Someone could write a book on all the elementary mistakes that were somehow built (twice!) with this allegedly-basic dark ride with a shockingly-high cost.
I'm generally in favor of following CM directions, but there are times, like when the theater is only half full and you're stuck in crappy seats, that a little judicious ignoring of screaming CMs is in order.My view of the show is totally negative, I'm afraid. We only saw the stage show once, but thanks to being first into the theater, ended up at the extreme end of the of the row (totally unnecessary as the theater and row were both only half full, but CMs literally screamed at us when we tried to leave the bad seats at the end vacant). We could only see the right 2/3 of the stage (so all scenes and songs on the rock outcropping at the left side of the stage were not visible), and what little we did see was at an awkward angle, with a distracting view of actors breaking character in the stage left wings. It was such a frustrating waste of time, and the use of movie clips seemed such a cheap cop-out (the fact that we'd seen the infinitely superior Nemo show at AK the day before really distorted our expectations), we never went again and were surprised it lasted as long as it did. I'm glad others were able to enjoy it and sorry for their sake that it's going away, but Disney can do better, and I hope it does.
Mickey and the Magical Map is a terrific show that would fit very nicely in DHS. But I’m guessing it’s expensive to run given the number of equity performers in the show.
My view of the show is totally negative, I'm afraid. We only saw the stage show once, but thanks to being first into the theater, ended up at the extreme end of the of the row (totally unnecessary as the theater and row were both only half full, but CMs literally screamed at us when we tried to leave the bad seats at the end vacant). We could only see the right 2/3 of the stage (so all scenes and songs on the rock outcropping at the left side of the stage were not visible), and what little we did see was at an awkward angle, with a distracting view of actors breaking character in the stage left wings. It was such a frustrating waste of time, and the use of movie clips seemed such a cheap cop-out (the fact that we'd seen the infinitely superior Nemo show at AK the day before really distorted our expectations), we never went again and were surprised it lasted as long as it did. I'm glad others were able to enjoy it and sorry for their sake that it's going away, but Disney can do better, and I hope it does.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.