ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
I believe you have a good chance.Thanks for the hope. My wife and I will be there at the end of April and the beginning of May so maybe we will get to see some of it.
I believe you have a good chance.Thanks for the hope. My wife and I will be there at the end of April and the beginning of May so maybe we will get to see some of it.
Why are they advertising summer 2018 when all indications are that it will be complete way before then?
So Toy Story Land is just another Hester and Chester. Nice going, TDO!
My guess is that by 'summer' they mean 'Memorial Day Weekend' which is the beginning of the tourist summer season. They like to do grand openings on MDW, and MDW was probably their target date before they decided to pull the trigger on the GMR -> MMRR conversion. With the GMR out of commission, they are now hurrying to get TSL done. And if they get it done way ahead of schedule, they look good. They can do lots of previews with press, APs, DVCs, and cast to generate buzz. Then they can do soft openings. Then they'll be ready to go 100% for a grand opening on MDW.
But, that's just a guess.
Now, you *know* that's not true. Primeval Whirl and T-Spin are off-the-shelf order-from-Amazon rides. Slinky's a unique coaster design and the Saucer ride, like Mater's JYJ, is a Disney original (and it's excellent!). TSL ain't Cars Land, but it looks like a pleasant addition to the studios.So Toy Story Land is just another Hester and Chester. Nice going, TDO!
Now, you *know* that's not true. Primeval Whirl and T-Spin are off-the-shelf order-from-Amazon rides. Slinky's a unique coaster design and the Saucer ride, like Mater's JYB, is a Disney original (and it's excellent!). TSL ain't Cars Land, but it looks like a pleasant addition to the studios.
You sure do have a funny way of expressing your love of Toy Story. The only thing I can think is that your "love" is dependent on meeting certain criteria set by you.I hope you're right, because I love the Toy Story movies.
You sure do have a funny way of expressing your love of Toy Story. The only thing I can think is that your "love" is dependent on meeting certain criteria set by you.
Yeah, the comparison isn't really fair to Chester/Hester. That area is thematically coherent, appropriate and even witty in the context of Dinoland as a whole. Plus, it's part of a land that has a genuine E-ticket as well as one of the best shows on property (a show that doesn't necessarily belong in that land, but still). Finally, Chester/Hester was almost half of a long-promised, supposedly park-saving makeover for a theme park that was incomplete at opening and has remained that way for decades.Yeah, the Chester/Hester declaration is a bit premature. This looks/feels more like Storybook Circus to me. None of these are remotely close to the best that Disney can do, but it's not the worst. This is a "filler" land to round out the attraction lineup for the park. It should have had another B/C-ticket in the land, but oh well.
Yeah, the comparison isn't really fair to Chester/Hester. That area is thematically coherent, appropriate and even witty in the context of Dinoland as a whole. Plus, it's part of a land that has a genuine E-ticket as well as one of the best shows on property (a show that doesn't necessarily belong in that land, but still). Finally, Chester/Hester was almost half of a long-promised, supposedly park-saving makeover for a theme park that was incomplete at opening and has remained that way for decades.
Storybook Circus gets a pass because it replaced something that was considerably worse - and was part of the makeover of a single LAND (not a whole park, mind you) that added a major restaurant, a borderline E-Ticket (that should have been longer) and an unfairly maligned D-Ticket.
Dino isn't a classic but it's considerably better than TSMM.Dinosaur is a lousy E-Ticket. Two-thirds of the ride is being violently shaken in the dark. Between that and Primeval Whirl, it's like they really really want you to break your spine.
And if you're giving a pass to Storybook because it's better than what it's replaced, then I'm sure you'll want to extend that same dispensation to TSL which is replacing part of Back Lot Tour -- which had grown moribund -- and actual back lot area which was useless to guests as an attraction/ride.
I'm guessing that the one decision to close the actual studio had nothing to do with the demise of the back lot tour? I mean, really, they could have just left it alone even if you can't have a back lot if you don't have a working studio. It is a stretch for even the most fertile of imaginations. The truth was that even when it was a working studio, the back lot tour, in the ride form portion that you are thinking about, sucked. Even in early years the graveyard consisted of stuff that was mostly old history, rusty, nasty looking and boring. So it wasn't hard for it to "grow moribund" since it started out that way.Back Lot Tour, when it opened, was a strong attraction. It hadn't "grown moribund," WDW management made decisions that chipped away at it and let it decay to an absurd degree, which is their pattern - fail to maintain an attraction and then close it.
Corrected that for youMy opinion was that even when it was a working studio, the back lot tour, in the ride form portion that you are thinking about, sucked..
Compared to the back lot tour at Universal in California, it sucked so bad that it became the reason for the vacuum in space.Corrected that for you
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.